>> (p.1)
    Author Topic: BitNames - DNS Auction  (Read 4539 times)
    bytemaster (OP)
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 770
    Merit: 568

    fractally


    View Profile WWW
    July 05, 2013, 03:04:51 PM
    Last edit: August 29, 2013, 04:20:53 AM by bytemaster
     #1

    I have come up for a new take on name registration which I believe is superior to Namecoin and would like to get some feedback on it.   Before I describe my solution I would like to review my design criteria:

    1) No artificial rate limits.
    2) No price fixing.
    3) Minimal carrying costs.
    4) Everyone benefits when a new name is registered.
    5) Names should be put to the highest economic purpose.
    6) Initially 100% of all potential names belong to the network.

    Based on those criteria I have identified the following system:

    1) When someone wants to register a new name, it goes up for auction to the highest bidder.  
    2) After X days with no bids the name is now owned by the highest bidder.
    3) Proceeds from new name auctions are split between the miners and BitName (the backing currency) holders.  In effect, you are paid dividends simply for holding BitName in your wallet.
    4) Names that are already owned may be transfered or put up for auction.  When they go up for auction again the proceeds go to the prior owner rather than the miner.
    5) Once per year everyone must prove they still control the private key or the name is released.

    The result of this system is that mining BitName is like getting a share in all unclaimed names.  Names are like real estate and if you want to 'buy' a highly in demand name you will have to outbid everyone else who wants that name.  Those who mine early and often will get additional purchasing power ensuring they are able to buy the names they want in the future.  Those who attempt to 'squat' will end up paying more for the 'good names' and running out of funds.  They would be forgoing dividends once they purchased a name and have to rely on the appreciation of the name they just bought (and paid the highest price for).  In other words, squatting would make no financial sense under this system.

    Lastly names like:  Bytemaster31415 would probably be very cheap to acquire as no one would have any profit motive to out bid me.  If they did, I would just change my name to Bytemaster4321 and leave them stuck holding an almost worthless name.

    Thoughts?

    https://fractally.com - the next generation of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).
Page 1
Viewing Page: 1