There is one God.


Thank You.

Strong evidence makes for a strong case. If it were spelled out for us, it would be fact and we would not have to believe. We would know.

Nobody knows for a fact that the 3 laws I science that I mentioned are absolute laws in the universe. But they are so strong that they are held as laws. Strong evidence. Very strong evidence.

Again this all can not be proven or dis proven.

It is said that the Bible is the word of god.   But this may or may not be true.  People believe in it. But doesn't make it true.  It could be just simply stories as some people call them.  Like a living journal of the times or just a book full of stories picked.  Not saying it isn't true but.  No one knows for sure. and this goes same for 2. and 3.

You can deny or not deny.  But either way doesnt make any of it true.  There is no proof that jesus is son of god or that even a god creator exists.

And depending on what you mean by mankind can save themselves without outside help.  This could be true as well.  Someone stated that we were given free will and the ability to choose our outcome.  If this is so.  We would be able to save ourselves.  Depends on outlook.  How someone preceives this.  It would depend on the choices we make and how we as a society work together.  Unless you mean that outside help being god.

All depends on what you believe in and how you want to see things.

 

Scholars agree that the ending of Mark was added to the gospel of Mark long after the gospel of Mark was written, it was added by man, so this alone proves that part of the bible was written by man, therefore it cannot be an impossible book, i.e. one written entirely by GOD.

Wow, how convenient! No need to think, just believe that all of history aligns to your worldview and your magical thinking.

Contrast this wishful thinking with Phoenix Journals which were scribed very recently;
Fact is that this Grandmother managed to write a 200-page book EVERY 3 WEEKS FOR YEARS, hundreds of books in total.  How was this prodigious output, covering such a wide range of topics, possible?  Please do not be too quick to reject the truthful answer, that she scribed DIRECTLY for our Heavenly Father, exactly as stated.  There probably has NEVER been a scribe so well connected — including all of the great ones acknowledged in all of the holy books.

Introduction to the writings:
 http://phoenixsourcedistributors.com/html/gch.html

The Journals are free. Print them out if you wish; the paper emits less EMF than your computer screen.

Emmanuel tried to teach the truth nearly 2,000 years ago, and he never once suggested that he was my "savior". That is a deception of the adversary because no one can take responsibility for another when it comes to obeying God's Laws--that is magical thinking and it is totally against all reason and also contrary to Psalms 1 where it says that one is blessed if one "meditates upon God's Law day and night"; a "savior" is also synonymous with the idea that one is separate from God, which is not true because "God resides within you".

Let us again review what fundamentalists like BADecker are saying:


You call these Journals stupid, but you make that claim in total ignorance (you have not read any Journal), just like you believe that all of history aligns to your worldview and your magical thinking--it is totally wishful thinking and willful ignorance. How nice that you don't have to think about information and rationally evaluate it.

Since the Phoenix Journals are free, it seems to me like your salary depends on you not understanding certain things, like the concept of magical thinking and the fact that Man has tampered with the Bible on many occasions.
By the way, you have failed to reply to my questions here; I am tired of having to re-state them:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1054513.msg12423520#msg12423520

Simple question.  If there is one god, one savior, one teaching or what now.

Why is Christianity not the oldest religion.  Its not the first. Hinduism dates back a few thousand years before Christians even existed.  How can this be?  There was a God before the God we all follow today?  People worshiped anther deity?

If this is true which god or Gods are the fake ones.  Made up?  I think some have to be.  If there are multiple religions why?  Dont you think there should be one?

Again. Christianity is a belief system.  But it doesn't make it true.

I believe in God. I respect the Abrahamic faiths but do not adhere to them (as God knows.)

But I do not necessarily feel the need to believe in the Pope because I have an understanding of the history of the formation of the Catholic Church - i.e. the political context at the time, the Council of Niacea and the fact that Christians were becoming a political thorn in the side of the occupying force, after 300+ years of persecution.

I believe Jesus was a prophet. His divinity is up for debate, but that is certainly not helped by Atheist positions (some even choosing to ignore the obvious fact that a man called Jesus existed, as the historical record appears to show.)

The transition of the Roman Imperial Cult into the Roman Catholic Church was an interesting political U-Turn to say the least. But not at odds with the Roman Empire's history of bringing foreign religions 'into the fold' in some way, be it through the creation of sub-governance as was the case in Jesus' time or though other means.

Find it funny that there was no answer to my questions.

I have a load of respect for myself and others that I know.

See I think this is one of the problems with religion.  Everyone seems to be clouded by what they are taught.  That there is only one.  What if your wrong.  

I wont be believe in god, the pope, or the teachings until someone can prove to me its real.  

But again instead of a legitimate answer I get the above.

That is something else I hate about religion.  When something cant be explained you are told to ask the holy spirit, or read the bible for the answers, or pray that you may find the answer.  It rubbish for you don't know and don't want to answer.

You have no idea how much it irritates me that people are so close minded.  

Im open to the ideas of any religion.  It they have evidence of existence besides someones word or teachings that can not be proven to be true nor false.

I have a concise logical proof demonstrating that God exists based on definitions; please tell me which step of the proof you disagree with.

My proof defines God sufficiently, and yes it is based on external (observable, scientific) evidence; if my definition is missing something, you can point it out explicitly, hopefully after reading the proof carefully to understand the logic.

My definition: A supreme being who is the founder and guarantor of knowledge.
My proof: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/737322.5300

My advice is to read ALL teachings and then you can judge in wisdom of knowledge and discern for yourself which one(s) are valid truth.