...
I think these were the details that you and Kushedout were seeking. Several other substantial amounts that were also unsuuccessful in staking within a two week period were also sent to Bittrex for sale, as well as to Cryptsy and to Yobit.
Your tone, which is non-confrontational, is very much appreciated. However, I do see your posts as deflecting from the main issue and my commentary on Kushedout's original post. To restate the my main assertion: Ratecoin staking is heavily loaded in favour of a few, and more importantly, people were not being told about this when several of you were outlining staking strategies in advice to potential investors. That got to me.
I note that Kushedout thinks this diversion is gold. I agree with him. I don't have the time at the moment, but I shall shortly deal with his last post where he avoids my main question and resorts to name calling again.
Thanks for your input.
I'll give you few examples from Richlist:
http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/XRA/address.php?address=RTmChSgGEe3S3GfDEw9PnMZL7hi36Zes8V 90k balance, better minting/balance % than many top 10 addresses
http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/XRA/address.php?address=RT4EvrUSm63TYJRNxFTHg7At2t1tyS2H5q 54k balance, even better % than Kushed has
Even top10 addresses has huge differences who have received most. I understand your disappointment as you haven't staked once? So there must be some other reason than rigged network. I agree with Kushed that XRA favors smart stakers. I encourage you to check what kind of inputs best stakers with similar balance are using and then change your own inputs. You might have to wait even 10 days, but once you start staking your "system" should stabilize and start staking more often.
