Completely different use case that provides a better solution.
Semantics matter, it's not provable. In fact, quite the opposite for someone with a QC.
Actually, since there has never been a transaction from any of these addresses, the public key has not been exposed to the network, which makes them safe from QC attacks.
Anyway, you're grasping at straws if that's your best reason as to why these addresses are a bad idea. Bitcoin would likely die on the spot if QC attacks ever become a thing, so how does it even matter?
TIL I learned that 'highly unlikely' = 'provably impossible'
By this logic, bitcoin addresses are unsafe because there's a 'highly unlikely' chance that someone could guess your privkey.
