I think you've forgot to write their responsibilities.
About involvement, it's hard to say for me, even after chatting to them all, I am not sure that everybody of them knows how to officially describe their positions.
Adam was involved in helping them. How far the word "help" reaches, I am not sure. But here are some facts that should be mentioned too.
1. Adam has built up a team from community, he was always stating that community should decide.
2. Not surprising, but community has choosen same crooks for moderating, same like on hashtalk. On this point I see some contraversy in communty overtake which is runned by same people that had control before?
3. Adam has his own project xpy.io, where
same people are involved. Example is
Richard Nelson (aka CeForce) on their forum. He is the responsible one for support on xpy.io and on bitlend.io . At the same time he is Mod on their payscamtalk where he was the one who suggested.
4. Same people have direct access to all sensible data, like verification data on xpy.io or bitlend.io
5. Their team is even on Slack involved, for a question about any involvement of GAW staff (Joe), they tried to troll me out and Mr. Nelson suggested a ban of me, this is whole discussio which was accepted by all responsible members on this vote:
@channel I call the question
I propose Boki15 be banned from slack for following reasons: Personal attack, unfounded and unproven statements against team members, community members, trolling, generally being a fucking asshole
tvle83, masteryoshigr, coinfairy and boxhock agreed. Which means everybody did agree on all these points. @Paul, do you really expect an answer from such clever guys?
6. Adam drives away from crypto, Allen is the one everybody listens to (obviously he is not lucky in a choise of his partners and friends, maybe it's better for him to quit).
7. Almost everybody of their staff owns at least one prime controller, just as example: CeForce, Krumz, yoshi, ...
Yellow one is involved into bitlend.io
8. Allen business ability is 0. There is nobody who controls this team or even who could lead a company an hold on all responsibilities an leading position brings with itself.
9. Whole team together went illegal way. They missuse customer confidential information.
10. SUGGESTION FOR DOXXING CAME FROM MOD STORMY, his name is
David Adkins.
11. Nobody of them wanted even to answer a question about Joe's involvement, and nobody was rough or rude to them when this question was raised. I mean, even Paul could not believe that Allen is such a crook.
12. They did not state that they might share customer data, which is not legal and nobody has ever approved such movement. It's illegal, and there have been very big companies which had consquences because of simple data sharing. This point is very heavy, expecially after
Dr. Dick Allen doxxed me in posting confidential information, during the launch phase of bitlend.io. Looks like him, or Paul?
Do not expect very clever answer from Mr. Dick
13. Point 12. proves that all people involved are not able to run legit business and probably stupidity is their excuse.
14. Point 13 shows that they will not be able to answer all questions. Starting with who owns/runs bitlend.io to the point where Allen and Adam should explain us why same people have access to confidential data which they use for doxxing a user for just asking about Joe's involvement. This is criminal activity.
15. Their criminal activity risks the lawsuit where 400+ people are involved and Allen will ask them soon for money. What should do these who want to quit because of all what is going on, how they now be sure that they will not be doxxed or even something worse.
16. Authorities and media have to be contacted regarding this question. I am unsure how the judge will like these facts and so many conflicts of interest. All this will end in even longer lawsuit which could cost much, much more without any security that money will be gotten back.
17. Couple of them have most coins, MK is top holder, that's why he is involved, as they always ask him too.
18. They all use haasbot on cryptsy for price manipulation, there is no trading volume.
There are much more points, just tired to write about some of these criminals, let's see what else Paul will find out
Fact is that all companies are involved with GAW in direct or non direct way, there is massive interest of conflict. These who are not in direct way involved, they are still supporting these who are directly connected.
As for a question who is involved, answer is simple, everybody of their teams. Some in different way, but still involved.
