crypto jerk - I think I've realized a major facet of the marketcap data that we've been overlooking, which is the effects of the share split and the absence of the subsequent price decrease that should have happened.
If 1,000,000 shares were sold at $1.00, for example, that would be $1,000,000 worth held by actual people other than Banx. If they are then given an additional 1,000,000 shares for free, they now have 2,000,000 shares for the same $1,000,000, which means the shares have a cost of $0.50 each.
But Coinmarketcap doesn't show that all early investors got their shares for $0.50, so Banx is publicly advertising a 245% "ROI" using Coinmarketcap as evidence. Is that misleading data, or a lie? Either way, it isn't good when this investment is marketed to the public using Search Engine Optimization.
(The above screencap showing public advertisement and general solicitation is from Banxplatinum.com, which is shared on Facebook, Linkedin, and can be found with a Google search)
http://www.seoevaluate.com/archive/banxplatinum-com/