>> (p.1)
    Author Topic: Irony of Australian e-currency laws  (Read 5945 times)
    BitPiggy (OP)
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 67
    Merit: 10



    View Profile WWW
    October 25, 2012, 04:08:03 AM
     #1

    Just blogged about the irony I saw in the Australian e-currency laws (link + comments here http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/121ewt/irony_of_australian_ecurrency_laws).

    For one, since bitcoin does not meet the government's definition of e-currency, bitcoin avoids a bunch of AML/CTF laws.

    Secondly, the definition of money implies that bitcoin isn't of interest to AUSTRAC since its too little like gold and too much like fiat (i.e. not backed by anything).

    Found that kind of interesting.
    ~Mat

    Links:
    Original post here: http://matholroyd.com/post/34232285907/the-irony-of-australian-e-currency-laws

    Anti-money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) Act 2006: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2012C00375/Html/Text#_Toc321138470

    AUSTRAC report explicitly stating bitcoin does not fall under AML/CTF laws: http://www.austrac.gov.au/files/typ_rprt12_full.pdf

    http://BitPiggy.com: Australian Dollars (AUD) to BitCoin exchange
    @bitpiggy

    Me: Ruby on Rails developer, 12+ years programming experience.
    @matholroyd, http://www.linkedin.com/in/matholroyd
Page 1
Viewing Page: 1