I support their goal of privacy but when they say stuff like this:


It makes you wonder if they truly understand how a ring signature works in current solutions of crypto that already exist. If you compromise the only party in the ring signature (yourself) then yeah you break privacy lol.

When you mix with other outputs in Monero you are the only person who knows what is really going on especially if you are using a high mixin number.

This is also based on new cryptography (not tested for a long period of time). But if you want to risk using it that's up to you.

They also do not address the drawbacks of using a zerocoin system as described by Dr. Adam Back:

(they fail to point out the cons of using zerocoin in its current form)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dAdI3Gzodo&t=32m46s



Zerocoin still has a trap door (i.e. in the RSA accumulator)

here is another gem:


you don't get speed without a trade off elsewhere in the system.

Where is that trade off? Not sure...they don't say where. Nor do they specify how their speed is achieved explicitly.

It looks more like a smear campaign than asking legitimate questions, especially considering the ALT coin you've been shilling for lately.

If you want truly want an answer to your legitimate questions I suggest you tone it down a little bit and ask them like an adult would. IE:

Spare me the lecture buddy.

I've asked legitimate questions that need to be addressed.

We've been down this road where you play the victim or make things out to be something they aren't. Let's deal in facts.

I have posted my questions/concerns and issues above. Now please tone down your condescending tone. Thanks  

Edit: Please try to stop the underhanded insults okay? Thanks.

 I'm not a child no matter how much you imply I am.

If they are indeed the same people then this isnt the FIRST implementation of zerocoin as they did zerovert in 2014 which ultimately failed.

Links above.

Yes, same guys that launched zerovert, but hard to say if it is or is not the first implementation, since they never released the source code for zerovert, just let it kind of burn to the ground. Also, Gary Le is apparently a college dropout and kind of a scumbag:
https://web.archive.org/web/20141016190714/http://blog.kevinzhang.me/posts/tracking-down-gary-le-the-thiel-fellow-and-dartmouth-dropout-who-tried-to-impersonate-me.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20141016203212/http://blog.kevinzhang.me/posts/tracking-down-gary-le-the-thiel-fellow-and-dartmouth-dropout-who-tried-to-impersonate-me-an-encore.html

Poramin did his master's under Matthew Green, so maybe the plan is to let the kids launch the implementation as a new coin next year. It's really not clear. Just have to wait and see...

What you call playing the victim or making things out to be something they aren't I call telling the honest truth. Then again, I prefer to deal in reality. Maybe you can teach us peasants how to be omniscient like you when provided incomplete information.

Yes you did, but the problem is the way you did so. It looks more like accusatory propaganda than actual questions that wanted legit answers. The fact you copy and pasted your messages on both forums doesn't help any, considering he likely doesn't know this thread exists and will not reply here. That, along with the fact you've been shilling for Montero for quite some time now makes it look like propoganda.


The term treat others as you would like to be treated applies here.


You always like to have the last word in our arguments so you can feel like you "won" the argument, so as always I will let you have the last word. I assume you will post some bs to spin the situation how you want others to perceive it, and if I keep responding we will be stuck in a never ending loop. Peace out.

Deal in facts.

I've posted questions and links.

All you are doing is digging a deeper hole for yourself by underhandedly attacking me with sly insults.

Stay on topic.

Its possible to implement Zerocoin using RSA UFO's without a backdoor. This has been pointed out many many times

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.28.4015
https://wiki.anoncoin.net/RSA_UFO

EDIT:
not saying they did, just that it is possible to do.