Really? The federal reserve obfuscated so well for 100 years that nobody understands their scheme ... yet everyone still uses it.

People need to understand how to use bitcoin and how it is better money ... that's all.

I kind of disagree here. Why is it better money? To understand why it's better and why you can trust the scarcity, you need to understand the technical details down to a certain level (the level at which you trust the properties of the building blocks).

For me, these building blocks are mainly "cryptographic hash function", "signing using asymmetric cryptography". I don't fully understand how these work internally, but I trust them to exhibit the relevant properties. From these properties, assuming a understanding of the further concepts of "proof of work", "transaction", "blockchain", follows the trust I have in the scarcity of bitcoins.

I believe that someone who didn't see for himself how he can trust that scarcity will not, in the end, trust it.

The federal reserve instilled the trust into FIAT by "regression" (used to be redeemable in gold), disinformation and regulatory capture.

I would like to be better than them and get people to trust bitcoin voluntarily and fundamentally by their own understanding of this truly revolutionary system.

Point taken. Maybe the masses don't need proof (by understanding), they might be content to "follow example" or "trust by proxy".

I think it might greatly help to educate as much as possible, though and I wont stop thinking about and trying out new ways of explaining the technicalities and ideas comprising Bitcoin. Understanding these probably has some favorable side-effects, too.

Yep I agree with this.

It's easy for people to accept  Fed's notes because nobody really gives them much of a choice.

For someone to start to accept bitcoin on the other hand, (s)he must  decide to do so.  That's a totally different mental process.