That 4% isn't given "for free."  It's an attempt to put the risk on devs, while giving them a chance to earn back/profit from what they already put into the project.

Developing and launching a project like this isn't cheap, and this is the most fair way to deal with that fact they could think of.

Can you do better?  Great.

It's not like they launched the dCred like Evan launched Dash, IE by surprise and with a broken emission system that granted them 20% off all the coins, then made it worse by lowering the maximum number of coins.

Sure we do,please set out your proposals

I Agree.

Icebreaker is a despicable human being. He is a professional liar and troller.

Be well aware of that.

Please remove this user (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=233575) from  AIRDROP database. He ammitted that he has exploited the airdrop with multi account.

Also please report him.


They talking in italian on how they exploited the airdrop.Splatters has used BTCTALK multiaccount and decred forum multiaccount.

The other user suggest Splatters to use TOR but he didn't ammit the SCAM, only Splatters does.

Please investigate and BAN before the genesis launch.

I understand and concur with your words. I will not mention this topic again if not necessary.

Some of us here have some experience with each other in this forums. Sadly, I know some people background very well.

best regards,

I pray that the Cryptocurrencies Community stop acting like its a civil war, and learn to be a family. We should respect each other projects, but I only see trolling and mischief: actions that hurt all cryptocoins. Of course it's revolting to see how these despicable trolls act in a shameless manner: I can easily understand aleix's reaction. But its stupid to keep feeding those disagreements.
Shame to see that the members of this community are fighting each other, instead of uniting. There's a lot to learn from each crypto project, for the benefit of all.

What bothers me,

c0's % of the premine should be priced at $1.00 per decred. The price "at which this project may be able to sustain itself at 10% subsidy"

(Beyondtext said "If we assume the value of 1 decred averages to USD 1.00 over the first year, this means we'll have USD 302K to spend on development work.  This is a small amount of funding and can pay for 3-4 full time developers for 1 year, so if we went below 10% dev subsidy it would mean the project cannot fund itself unless its exchange rate is well over USD 1.00 per decred")

But then c0's guaranteed 400,000 decred PoS awards in year 1 MUST also be considered in the "compensation package".
This 400,000 "free and guaranteed" PoS is more than the dev fund receives in year 1, yet is totally unaccounted for in the c0 "compensation package"

c0 "imply" they are not seeking profit here. They just say they want "compensation for bring up costs" = $420,000. ok fair enough.
But, c0's "compensation package" is structured to produce 3x that figure = "compensation for bring up cost + 200% profit"
(100% profit at launch + 100% profit in yr 1. based on decred price "at which this project may be able to sustain itself at 10% subsidy")

So, a fairer "compensation package for bring up costs" would be something like,
TOTAL received by c0 at end year1 (premine + PoS) = 420,000 decred.
(ALL the premine/distribution/PoS figures would need changing)

I guess first, they will publish the statistics of the airdrop. If i remember right they said that maybe this week the testnet will be running

Just let Decreds concensus process take care of new ideas and changes, it's not Bitcoin where PoW miners can easily block a consensus change.

No ICO? But how are they going to distribute 21m coins?