UPDATE:

A second Avalon has been obtained by bASIC-MINING. Details to follow.

please post yesterday's hash rate, and today's hash rate, if possible

I have had a hard time keeping up

Your demands will have to wait till tomorrow...must sleep.

Both Avalons are load balanced on bitparking, bitminter, and slush. Hopefully variance will be manageable this way.

Cheers.

This is more complicated with the Avalons set to balance share submissions on three separate pools as each updates stats at different speeds. The status display on the Avalons seem to average out to right around 70,000Mh/s each @ 300Mhz so we're getting about 140,000Mh/s from them.

We're mining as timonex on bitminter, which says 44,120Mh/s right at this moment, but varies by a few percent +/-. This is public and should generally be about 1/3 of our Avalon mining power as both Avalons are currently set to submit 1/3 of their shares to bitminter.

Cheers.

Edit:

To follow up on this here's our status display on bitparking ATM:



As you can see the variance can be pretty brutal.  

I'll try to get moar pics snapped in the near future.

While I like low fees, Horrible Horrendous TT doesn't appear to do merged mining or shared transaction fees. The other pools I've chosen do at least one or the other...if not both(slush & bitminter). Bitparking is working on adding shared transaction fees and has reduced their fee to 0% until it's implemented.

I'm considering a new motion.

I'd like to get a sense of what other shareholders think of the idea of a stock split. We have a lot of shareholders with < 10 shares and I think for some liquidity is becoming a problem. I feel that if we did a 3x or 4x split many of our smaller investors could take some profit if they so choose while still maintaining a stake in bASIC-MINING. Conversely many smaller investors on the sidelines could take a position without bASIC-MINING becoming an uncomfortably large portion of their diversified portfolios. Thoughts?  

Edit: I believe this is possible with current btct.co software...perhaps burnside can weigh in on this.

I was actually thinking about this today before you posted it, and had a 10:1 split in mind.  While technically a non-event, it does go a long way to investor psychology.  I am in for the long term hold, but this would give those looking for the short term trade more options.  There is a large war chest (1400+) of bitcoin to put to work, so the share price has a way to go, but if nobody is willing to sell....

It also adds the ability to reinvest dividends quicker for those who wish to hold and have smaller amounts of shares.

Getting the share price down through a split will also put a damper on anyone wishing to start a micro-share passthrough in the near future.  So putting the motion out there is a great idea.

Thanks for the input guys.

I hadn't really considered a split with the kind of granularity that a 10:1 could provide, but it's an interesting option. I'm a fan of automatic dividend reinvestment programs and it's one of the primary reasons I wanted to implement these burdensome daily payouts in the first place. With the current relatively high share price DRIP's usefulness is less than optimal and a split will go a ways toward correcting this as well as increasing liquidity for some.

I'm fairly sure this is possible with a trading security and not just an import, but let me check in with burnside to be certain before starting a motion.

Cheers.

10:1 would seem the sensible division. Very easy for all to just move the decimal and would give a nice level of liquidity. I think this would be forward thinking.