This is a very old and familiar issue in science and engineering, where quantities have values that may vary over orders of magnitude.
It's been resolved by referring to quantities in SI engineering units (milli, micro, nano, kilo, mega etc).
The idea is you figure out the 'closest' of those units to use where 'close' is defined by the unit leaving an integer value with maybe one or two decimal points.
Noone would ever use stuff like 0.000001 btc, for example. It would simply be 1 microbitcoin (1uBTC).
Even if satoshis were considered the base unit,  noone would ever use 100000000 satoshis, it would be 100 megasatoshis (probably 100MS if it became common enough).

So, at the moment if we're dealing with USD, a millibitcoin is the best unit for every day transaction sizes.

It requires some familiarity with the SI engineering units, but it's sensible to take a lead from the people who deal with ranges like this every day, right?
Even the financial world (where they like to add many zeroes) is now using 'k' to indicate a 1000 multiplier.
People know what 'k' and 'M' mean now as well. It's not so hard.

There's a couple of sensible options (everything in SI units with satoshis as the base, or everything in SI units with bitcoin as the base). It's unfortunate Satoshi made the smallest unit 10^-8 btc instead of 10^-9 (a nanobitcoin). if he had, we'd not even need satoshi as a unit.

And there's no need to add an unnecessary new unit like 'bit', when all it is is a microbitcoin (maybe 'micro' for short) - that's just stupid and confusing.

Well, I already do deal with bitcoin in terms of mBTC.  That's the wonderful thing about the decimal system...one can think about it in any terms they wish.  It my help some who have a problem comprehending decimals to learn engineering notation.  It's a great format to simplify decimal places in one's mind on the fly.

Yeah, why not? mBTC can be easier for micro transaction and small earnings for us newbies, whereas BTC are more used by miners and large companies. I suppose different units of bitcoin can be used in different places, so each is useful in some way. Many sites now also offer mBTC as a unit, like coinad, but it makes the earnings look small.

hey maybe you got little bit of misunderstood him .op is saying to count the transaction in mbtc until we get a 1bitcoin that means a whole number and by the way op you can use the mbtc viewinv setting almost present in every wallet and alsomt in every site there are a lot of people who had thought the same stuff and i am sure you will find some of them at bitcointalk community too.hey but in my opinion i dont think mbtc will be a good idea i always go for satoshi unit when ever i see any bitcoin transaction its the perfect unit of me

Yes, the unit of bitcoin for our ease of use and for better understanding. So, one all time standardization is not possible for bitcoin and for any commodity/currency also. So, let the users to choose for their convenience.

Well, it's the nature of human's greed
More number in yo wallet = more happiness (even tho sometimes it's cheap)

100ksat is not 1BTC though, you might wana be careful when trading.

I don't exactly see a point of using mbtc instead of BTC as it just happens to be pointless. Just like using Satoshis. Bitcoin in its own is fine.

I agree completely that if mBTC is the base currency it will be much better, a full BTC is simply too expensive to use it as a corner for BTC trades and transactions and it gives the general public a view that BTC is just less useful since they don't fully understand how one satoshi can be exchanged.