I'm trying to deliver more productive inputs as I posted earlier. I hope you can now better understand my considerations.
topic of this post:
why I believe better-staking-wallets are bad.
So let's assume there are three people and the dev vegasguy, each holding 15 XDE before the swap, they get 105 XDEII after the swap.
vegasguy gets a Platinum wallet, person1 a gold wallet, person 2 a silver wallet, and person 2 as poor guy uses the standard wallet.
each start with the same amount of XDE.do show how drastically the imbalance of the different wallets increase very soon, here a short comparison how they each will perform with staking within 2 years.
All numbers are used from the image metamorphin posted recently, which can also be found in the first post (instead of 3 XDE, each started with 15 XDE before the swap).

We can see, that Platinum holds over 2083 XDE after one year, whereas a standard user with they same start amount of XDE only holds 771 XDE. Platinum gets 270% of what a standard user gets.
We can also see, that after two year this gets even worse, when Platinum holds 41333 XDE, whereas Standard user holds ridiculously 5670 XDE.
Conclusion, to stay competitive as a stakeholder, you have to buy a premium-wallet from dev.
To stake as good as the dev, you have to
1. spend over 2500 USD worth of bitcoins to get a platinum wallet.
2. be quick enough, there are only 2 of them available for public.

I made the spreadsheet above where all shareholders have the same amount of starting XDE.
As everyone ones,
this won't be reality. There won't be many people which holds more than 10 XDE, for them it gets even worse, the longer the whole staking goes on.
Their coins lose value, because they loose shares. The only ones who got more and even better shares are those, who uses Platinum wallets with a high start amount of XDE.
I not only think, this is absolutely greedy. I think this isn't healthy for a coin. It won't work for long.
What can we do to fix this? Total span from 200% to 300%
is too much.
I would recommend to forget the whole idea of different-staking-wallets, but if not, If you want to stay with this whole different-staking-wallets-idea,
you have to reduce the size of the span between lower-staking-wallet and highest-staking wallets drastically.
Just a proposal: Standard wallet: 200%, Silver wallet 205%, Gold wallet 212%, Platinum wallet 220%.
Another thing: the restriction of only total 2 platinum wallets (for public), only 5 gold, only 10 silver should be removed.
Make your calculations, even that's more than enough.
As price for the wallets, another proposal: standard wallet: free, silver wallet 0.1 BTC, gold wallet 0.25 BTC, platinum wallet 0.4 BTC.
I hope you no longer see me as a troll and consider my inputs.