Just go and watch the crypto show interview with Claudia D. of BUZZcoin and tell me if that is a project u will call it what u have been calling..... just be honest to yourself..... go and read the whitepaper and try to understand the purpose of the project......

..

....

This coin is very beneficial for us who have followed the signature and can be an interesting thing for purchases with high prices so don't ever hesitate again.

Plain English which seems like you do not understand all that well.

You say scam he says it’s not.  Why is it a scam? Reasons? He and I have put money into this project so we say it’s not a scam.  Typically scam projects don’t do public interviews such as Wild West and have original updated white paper.  Take your BS elsewhere. 

Ok, you answered at last.
What you say sounds good, but it implies that only this very special kind of "clients" (NASA etc) would be interested in buying buzzcoin. It is better than nothing, but I dont see a "bullish" market for buzzcoin just because some institutions are interested in collecting bees data, specially if they are as strong as NASA and can stablish their own network or instalations to study the bees.
I sold my position months ago and from that moment on the coin did nothing but go down up to zero, so I dont see that doing bussines with NASA is that good.

Referring to him as being passionate .... that i wil oppose coz he doesnt really care abt the project or the bees .... all what he cares about is what is going to make the price grow ...lol .... it is the Price he cares about .... and if he sold his position months ago ... let him back out .... i told him this already .... just asking silly questions ....

I clicked but there is nothing valuable there. Is this what you call research?
My (valid) argument is that you can not have a product which can be sold to only one client which, by the way, is much, much more stronger than you will ever be and can easily stablish its own net.
The coin might eventually succed, but thats veeeery dificult because you have almost no clients.
If you decide to drop the mic that's ok, but I believe that you do so because you can not really write down any strong reason to oppose what I say.
I dont drop my mic.
(I have seen that you have corrected your previous post, in which you said:
1.- that I should visit https://honeybeenet.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sites.htm todo some research. I write it down again so that everybody can see that there is nothing valuable in that link. Is this what you call research?
2.- You aldo deleted a paragraph in wich you said that you dropped you mic.
I write it again just because otherwise my answer wouldnt make sense. I think that it is not fair to change afterwards a post pretending that the answer I gave you is silly. Once you write something down you shouldnt correct it, just for respect to the people who reads these posts.)
WOW Claudia: you even have deleted your yesterdays message so it is impossible to track the answer. Too bad. From now on everytime that I answer you again I will quote your message so that you can not do any deleting or editing any more. Are you really the Public Relations for buzzcoin project? Is this the way you think is the appropiate to talk to the community? No wonder buzzcoin is almost zero.