<<  >> (p.126)
    Author Topic: [LOCKED] cpuminer-opt v3.12.3, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner  (Read 444201 times)

    • Amph
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 3276
    Merit: 1072



    View Profile
    April 27, 2017, 07:06:44 AM
     #2501
    this don't support verium right?

  • joblo (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1470
    Merit: 1114


    View Profile
    April 27, 2017, 12:00:34 PM
     #2502
    Quote from: Amph on April 27, 2017, 07:06:44 AM
    this don't support verium right?

    Maybe it does, I haven't tried it.

    http://vrm.poolinat0r.com/index.php?page=gettingstarted
    AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
    BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,

  • digaran2
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 478
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    April 28, 2017, 06:57:09 AM
     #2503
    Quote from: joblo on April 27, 2017, 12:00:34 PM
    Quote from: Amph on April 27, 2017, 07:06:44 AM
    this don't support verium right?

    Maybe it does, I haven't tried it.

    http://vrm.poolinat0r.com/index.php?page=gettingstarted
    it support vrm,but many times to reconnet!

  • degxtra1
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 234
    Merit: 46


    View Profile
    April 28, 2017, 01:47:59 PM
    Last edit: April 28, 2017, 03:06:42 PM by degxtra1
     #2504
    Sorry, I can't  find any faq how to compile it on debian . I tried build autogen sh configure tc but still no .deb package produced successfully - any help?


    so far after executing build.sh

    Code:
    algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c: In function ‘hodl_scanhash’:
    algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c:90:21: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘GenRandomGarbage’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
       GenRandomGarbage( hodl_scratchbuf, work->data, thr_id );
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    In file included from algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c:8:0:
    algo/hodl/hodl-wolf.h:25:6: note: expected ‘CacheEntry * {aka union _CacheEntry *}’ but argument is of type ‘unsigned char *’
     void GenRandomGarbage( CacheEntry *Garbage, uint32_t *pdata, int thr_id);
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl-gate.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl-gate.Po
    g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -Iyes/include -fno-strict-aliasing -I./compat/jansson -I. -Iyes/include  -O3 -march=native -Wall -std=gnu++11 -MT algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.o -MD -MP -MF algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Tpo -c -o algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.o `test -f 'algo/hodl/hodl_uint256.cpp' || echo './'`algo/hodl/hodl_uint256.cpp
    algo/hodl/hodl.cpp: In function ‘int scanhash_hodl(int, work*, uint32_t, uint64_t*)’:
    algo/hodl/hodl.cpp:96:18: error: aggregate ‘EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined
       EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx;
                      ^~~




    Makefile:3335: recipe for target 'algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl.o' failed
    make[2]: *** [algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl.o] Error 1
    make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
    mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Po
    mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Po
    mv -f algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Tpo algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Po
    make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/qa/cpuminer2/hmage/cpuminer-opt'
    Makefile:3496: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
    make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/qa/cpuminer2/hmage/cpuminer-opt'
    Makefile:671: recipe for target 'all' failed
    make: *** [all] Error 2



    Ok SORTED     This works on debian testing

    Make sure you have installed :
    libboost-dev
    libboost-system-dev
    libboost-thread-dev
    libssl-dev
    libcurl4-openssl-dev
    g++

    ./autogen.sh
    ./configure
    make
    sudo make install

  • joblo (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1470
    Merit: 1114


    View Profile
    April 28, 2017, 03:04:34 PM
     #2505
    Quote from: degxtra1 on April 28, 2017, 01:47:59 PM
    Sorry, I can't  find any faq how to compile it on debian . I tried build autogen sh configure tc but still no .deb package produced successfully - any help?


    so far after executing build.sh

    Code:
    algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c: In function ‘hodl_scanhash’:
    algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c:90:21: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘GenRandomGarbage’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
       GenRandomGarbage( hodl_scratchbuf, work->data, thr_id );
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    In file included from algo/hodl/hodl-gate.c:8:0:
    algo/hodl/hodl-wolf.h:25:6: note: expected ‘CacheEntry * {aka union _CacheEntry *}’ but argument is of type ‘unsigned char *’
     void GenRandomGarbage( CacheEntry *Garbage, uint32_t *pdata, int thr_id);
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl-gate.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl-gate.Po
    g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -Iyes/include -fno-strict-aliasing -I./compat/jansson -I. -Iyes/include  -O3 -march=native -Wall -std=gnu++11 -MT algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.o -MD -MP -MF algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Tpo -c -o algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.o `test -f 'algo/hodl/hodl_uint256.cpp' || echo './'`algo/hodl/hodl_uint256.cpp
    algo/hodl/hodl.cpp: In function ‘int scanhash_hodl(int, work*, uint32_t, uint64_t*)’:
    algo/hodl/hodl.cpp:96:18: error: aggregate ‘EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx’ has incomplete type and cannot be defined
       EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx;
                      ^~~




    Makefile:3335: recipe for target 'algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl.o' failed
    make[2]: *** [algo/hodl/cpuminer-hodl.o] Error 1
    make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
    mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_uint256.Po
    mv -f algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Tpo algo/hodl/.deps/cpuminer-hodl_arith_uint256.Po
    mv -f algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Tpo algo/haval/.deps/cpuminer-haval.Po
    make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/qa/cpuminer2/hmage/cpuminer-opt'
    Makefile:3496: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
    make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/qa/cpuminer2/hmage/cpuminer-opt'
    Makefile:671: recipe for target 'all' failed
    make: *** [all] Error 2


    It looks like you may be trying to compile someone else's fork. If so I can't help you.
    Otherwise I need more info.
    AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
    BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,

  • degxtra1
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 234
    Merit: 46


    View Profile
    April 28, 2017, 03:09:11 PM
     #2506
    Quote from: joblo on April 28, 2017, 03:04:34 PM


    It looks like you may be trying to compile someone else's fork. If so I can't help you.
    Otherwise I need more info.

    yes, I published output from some fork, but problem existed till I updated missed libs.
    Would you explain me btw what is difference between build.sh  vs autogen.sh ?

  • felixbrucker
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 700
    Merit: 500


    View Profile WWW
    May 01, 2017, 09:35:03 AM
     #2507
    small question regarding cryptonight "stratum": each job contains job_id, blob and target

    if i connect multiple miners (say 4) to a single stratum emit (job message), do they mine on the same data (effectively mining with lower efficiency)?

    cheers

  • giagge
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1134
    Merit: 1001


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 12:26:47 PM
     #2508
    Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .

  • joblo (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1470
    Merit: 1114


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 01:11:59 PM
     #2509
    Quote from: felixbrucker on May 01, 2017, 09:35:03 AM
    small question regarding cryptonight "stratum": each job contains job_id, blob and target

    if i connect multiple miners (say 4) to a single stratum emit (job message), do they mine on the same data (effectively mining with lower efficiency)?

    cheers

    I can only relate my observations of how multiple threads work. Each thread hashes using the same data
    but chooses a unique nonce to avoid multiple threads submitting the same solution. Althouh Cryptonight
    uses a different RPC version than all other algos, that mechanism is the same.
    AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
    BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,

  • joblo (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1470
    Merit: 1114


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 01:28:58 PM
     #2510
    Quote from: giagge on May 01, 2017, 12:26:47 PM
    Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .


    I have no first hand experience with Ryzen and SHA and an have not seen any user reports other than
    the limited testing that was done by coinbutter.

    cpuminer-opt is the only miner I know of that uses the SHA extension on Ryzen so it should be the best.
    Only algos that use sha256 (listed in release notes) will benefit from this feature. Most of those algos are
    not attractive to CPU miners.

    Ryzen also has a larger L3 cache that gives it an advantage on memory intensive algos.

    Ryzen (AMD in general) has lower single thread performance but compensates with more threads. Mining
    is an excellent multithreaded application.

    In my opinion Ryzen is a good choice for CPU mining based on its price, high thread count and large L3 cache.
    Ironically SHA does not seem to be a significant factor.
    AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
    BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,

  • curtis8706
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 01:40:22 PM
     #2511
    Hey Guys,
    I'm new to altcoin mining in general so bear with me. My apologies if this was already addressed, I went through the thread and couldn't find the answer. If it is out there please just direct me to the answer.

    So I found this thread and started trying this cpuminer-opt. I've been using cupminer-multi for a few months now, and was excited to see something newer and possibly more optimized. I have a mix of older and newer hardware as I mine. When I run the CPuminer-opt, I am getting reports of rates that far exceed what is actually being recognized by the Pool I am in, MiningPoolHub. I am mining XZC (Zcoin) and when using cpuminer-multi I was seeing rates of about 200-300Kh/s. The cpuminer-opt with the same hardware was reporting as high as 14 Mh/s. Here is the line from my batch file: (separate for each .exe)

    cpuminer-sse2.exe -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://us-east.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581 -u curtis8706.12 -p x


    Here is a bit of what I am seeing.
    ----------------CPUMINER-MULTI----------------------
    Code:
    ** cpuminer-multi 1.3-dev by tpruvot@github **
    BTC donation address: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd (tpruvot)

    [2017-05-01 09:26:54] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2z' algorithm.
    [2017-05-01 09:26:54] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://us-east.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581
    [2017-05-01 09:26:55] Stratum difficulty set to 1
    [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #2: 27900.83 H/s
    [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #6: 27641.73 H/s
    [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #1: 27560.29 H/s
    [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #7: 27456.29 H/s
    [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #3: 27387.39 H/s
    [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #5: 27227.97 H/s
    [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #0: 27194.04 H/s
    [2017-05-01 09:26:58] CPU #4: 26415.17 H/s
    [2017-05-01 09:27:40] Stratum difficulty set to 0.722113
    [2017-05-01 09:27:48] CPU #1: 27608.08 H/s
    [2017-05-01 09:27:48] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 218831.49 H/s yes!

    ----------------CPUMINER-OPT-----------------------------------
    Code:
         **********  cpuminer-opt 3.5.9.1  ***********
         A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
         with AES_NI and AVX extensions.
         BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT
         Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits
         to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d,
         Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.

    CPU:        Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU features: SSE2 AES AVX
    SW built on Mar  4 2017 with GCC 4.8.3
    SW features: SSE2
    Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX AVX2
    Start mining with SSE2

    [2017-05-01 09:23:17] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://us-east.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581
    [2017-05-01 09:23:17] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2z' algorithm.
    [2017-05-01 09:23:17] Stratum difficulty set to 1
    [2017-05-01 09:23:18] Stratum difficulty set to 1.4737
    [2017-05-01 09:23:18] Stratum difficulty set to 1 (0.00391)
    [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #6: 65.54 kH, 25.57 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #2: 65.54 kH, 25.52 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #1: 65.54 kH, 25.15 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #7: 65.54 kH, 25.07 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #0: 65.54 kH, 24.86 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #3: 65.54 kH, 24.83 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #5: 65.54 kH, 24.78 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:23:21] CPU #4: 65.54 kH, 24.29 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:24:07] Stratum difficulty set to 1.03159
    [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #5: 1486.57 kH, 24.92 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #2: 1531.17 kH, 25.51 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #6: 1534.16 kH, 25.54 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #3: 1489.95 kH, 24.83 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #7: 1504.21 kH, 25.05 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #0: 1491.65 kH, 24.84 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:24:21] CPU #1: 1508.83 kH, 25.07 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:24:22] CPU #4: 1457.34 kH, 24.18 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:03] Stratum difficulty set to 0.722113
    [2017-05-01 09:25:07] CPU #0: 1149.34 kH, 24.91 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:08] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 11.66 MH, 200.02 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:09] CPU #1: 1189.11 kH, 25.11 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:09] Accepted 2/2 (100%), 11.34 MH, 200.06 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #5: 1495.26 kH, 24.91 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #2: 1530.60 kH, 25.51 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #6: 1532.39 kH, 25.55 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #3: 1489.99 kH, 24.84 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #7: 1503.25 kH, 25.06 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 09:25:21] CPU #4: 1450.97 kH, 24.30 kH/s

    Same hardware, just different miner. I let it run overnight and I saw a minor increase in the hashrate recognized by the pool, but no where near what the reported hash rate is. Am i missing a seeing or an argument to correct this? I'm not sure what I am doing wrong with this. Any help you guys can provide is much appreciated.

  • joblo (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1470
    Merit: 1114


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 04:10:31 PM
     #2512
    Quote from: curtis8706 on May 01, 2017, 01:40:22 PM
    The cpuminer-opt with the same hardware was reporting as high as 14 Mh/s.

    I don't see any 14 MH/s in anything you posted. Also you're using the slowest version of cpuminer-opt
    on a CPU that can handle the fastest AVX2 code.
    AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
    BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,

  • curtis8706
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 04:38:41 PM
     #2513
    Thanks for the reply. I didn't copy from when it was running overnight. so perhaps I am reading it wrong then. Again, I apologize because I am new to this stuff, so if I sound ignorant I don't mean to. I tried running the        
    cpuminer-aes-avx2.exe and it kept crashing on me. I was able to get cpuminer-aes-avx.exe to work though.

    [2017-05-01 12:24:09] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 13.71 MH, 267.44 kH/s

    Perhaps I am just reading the whole thing wrong then. I was just talking to a friend about it. So I am wondering then, is the 13.71MH the total work done, and the second part is the rate that is completed the work? I'm sorry if I missed that earlier in the thread.

  • joblo (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1470
    Merit: 1114


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 04:48:35 PM
     #2514
    Quote from: curtis8706 on May 01, 2017, 04:38:41 PM
    Thanks for the reply. I didn't copy from when it was running overnight. so perhaps I am reading it wrong then. Again, I apologize because I am new to this stuff, so if I sound ignorant I don't mean to. I tried running the        
    cpuminer-aes-avx2.exe and it kept crashing on me. I was able to get cpuminer-aes-avx.exe to work and I've copied that below.
    Code:
    **********  cpuminer-opt 3.5.9.1  ***********
         A CPU miner with multi algo support and optimized for CPUs
         with AES_NI and AVX extensions.
         BTC donation address: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT
         Forked from TPruvot's cpuminer-multi with credits
         to Lucas Jones, elmad, palmd, djm34, pooler, ig0tik3d,
         Wolf0, Jeff Garzik and Optiminer.

    CPU:        Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU features: SSE2 AES AVX
    SW built on Mar  4 2017 with GCC 4.8.3
    SW features: SSE2 AES AVX
    Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX AVX2
    Start mining with SSE2 AES AVX

    [2017-05-01 12:23:00] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://us-east.lyra2z-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20581
    [2017-05-01 12:23:00] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2z' algorithm.
    [2017-05-01 12:23:00] Stratum difficulty set to 1
    [2017-05-01 12:23:00] Stratum difficulty set to 1.70876
    [2017-05-01 12:23:00] Stratum difficulty set to 1 (0.00391)
    [2017-05-01 12:23:00] lyra2z block 32377, diff 3184.655
    [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #1: 65.54 kH, 33.95 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #6: 65.54 kH, 33.75 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #3: 65.54 kH, 33.70 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #7: 65.54 kH, 33.68 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #4: 65.54 kH, 33.04 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #5: 65.54 kH, 31.83 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #2: 65.54 kH, 30.16 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:23:03] CPU #0: 65.54 kH, 28.42 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:23:37] Stratum difficulty set to 1.70876 (0.00667)
    [2017-05-01 12:23:54] CPU #0: 1705.30 kH, 33.46 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:23:56] CPU #2: 1809.77 kH, 34.11 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:24:01] CPU #5: 1910.07 kH, 33.01 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:24:02] CPU #6: 2025.26 kH, 33.97 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:24:03] CPU #7: 2021.09 kH, 33.65 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:24:03] CPU #4: 1982.35 kH, 32.96 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:24:03] CPU #3: 2022.13 kH, 33.41 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:24:03] CPU #1: 2036.81 kH, 33.63 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:24:09] CPU #4: 182.30 kH, 32.19 kH/s
    [2017-05-01 12:24:09] Accepted 1/1 (100%), 13.71 MH, 267.44 kH/s
    Perhaps I am just reading the whole thing wrong then. I read that last line which is where I get that ~14 Mh/s from. So is it actually the second part after the comma that is the real output? Is that the number I am supposed to be reading as the actual hashrate? Thanks for your help!

    You're reading it wrong, it said 267 kH/s, don't confuse it with the hash count 13.71 MH.

    You should also use the mainstrean version (currently 3.6.3) of cpuminer-opt.
    AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
    BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,

  • curtis8706
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 05:23:05 PM
     #2515
    I understand now. sorry for the confusion. Thanks for your help!

  • Elder III
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1246
    Merit: 274


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 10:27:31 PM
     #2516
    Quote from: giagge on May 01, 2017, 12:26:47 PM
    Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .


    Ryzen mines very well on Monero, or anything else based on the Cryptonight algorithm. I have tested it on Crptolite (AEON) with even better results and on Xevan (BSD) with so so results.

  • joblo (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1470
    Merit: 1114


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 10:46:23 PM
     #2517
    Quote from: Elder III on May 01, 2017, 10:27:31 PM
    Quote from: giagge on May 01, 2017, 12:26:47 PM
    Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .


    Ryzen mines very well on Monero, or anything else based on the Cryptonight algorithm. I have tested it on Crptolite (AEON) with even better results and on Xevan (BSD) with so so results.

    Did you compile with SHA? It won't help cryptonight bt it does help m7m.
    AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
    BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,

  • Elder III
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1246
    Merit: 274


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 10:55:13 PM
     #2518
    Quote from: joblo on May 01, 2017, 10:46:23 PM
    Quote from: Elder III on May 01, 2017, 10:27:31 PM
    Quote from: giagge on May 01, 2017, 12:26:47 PM
    Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .


    Ryzen mines very well on Monero, or anything else based on the Cryptonight algorithm. I have tested it on Crptolite (AEON) with even better results and on Xevan (BSD) with so so results.

    Did you compile with SHA? It won't help cryptonight bt it does help m7m.

    I used pre-compiled binaries (I think your binaries). I am not smart/experienced enough to compile anything myself (I tried and it was a mess for me).

    *Is Windows 10 Pro (vs Home) needed for compiling?

  • joblo (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1470
    Merit: 1114


    View Profile
    May 01, 2017, 11:02:18 PM
     #2519
    Quote from: Elder III on May 01, 2017, 10:55:13 PM
    Quote from: joblo on May 01, 2017, 10:46:23 PM
    Quote from: Elder III on May 01, 2017, 10:27:31 PM
    Quote from: giagge on May 01, 2017, 12:26:47 PM
    Is not there yet a profit coin for ryzen? Which miner is now the best and what coin algo? .


    Ryzen mines very well on Monero, or anything else based on the Cryptonight algorithm. I have tested it on Crptolite (AEON) with even better results and on Xevan (BSD) with so so results.

    Did you compile with SHA? It won't help cryptonight bt it does help m7m.

    I used pre-compiled binaries (I think your binaries). I am not smart/experienced enough to compile anything myself (I tried and it was a mess for me).

    *Is Windows 10 Pro (vs Home) needed for compiling?

    I don't think so. I haven't been able to create a mingw/msys environment om Windows that supports compilation with SHA.
    AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
    BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,

  • joblo (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1470
    Merit: 1114


    View Profile
    May 02, 2017, 04:02:11 PM
     #2520
    cpuminer opt 3.6.4 adds support for timetravel10 algo used by bitcore (BTX).
    It has been optimized for AES and AVX2. "-a bitcore" is recongnized as an alias.

    I'm having problems uploading the Windows binaries to git so use google links.

    tarball: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZUTZvTG9ZMFFCaVU/view?usp=sharing

    Windows binaries: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZRlJzSzRHd3QwV0k/view?usp=sharing
    AKA JayDDee, cpuminer-opt developer. https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt
    https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5226770.msg53865575#msg53865575
    BTC: 12tdvfF7KmAsihBXQXynT6E6th2c2pByTT,
    Pages: « 1 ... 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 [126] 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 ... 197 »
      Print  
Page 125
Viewing Page: 126

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com