the purpose of bitcoin was not meant to break the bank and financial institution? so why bitcoin should need those things to survive?

those unknown services are not embracing bitcoin because of regulation, if they embrace somethign that is not easily traceable and taxed, they cna have problem with their government

this is the only reason, but for common private people, this is not a real issue, big institution instead have the obligation to declare everything at the end of the fiscal year, they are monitored more strictly, than an "average joe"

Bitcoin are independent,but remeber to buy bitcoins people need to deposit money online,soo paypal or other place were need to give you virtual balance,banks tranfers and deposits into exchanges to get bitcoins.. soo without the banks in the past i doubt bitcoin would ever exist....fiat are sticked to bank and bitcoin need fiat ,since there arent yet places enought to spend it.

Of course.  The purpose of the creator/creators was for Bitcoin to be independent. There are many good sources out there to read about the original intentions of Bitcoin and the possibilities - all are without banks.

You are not correct. Bitcoin have to many qualities and is liked (even more) by everyone of us who are in this forum. But must be careful in our enthusiasm about it and its qualities. Telling or alluding things without any kind of basis about it only make laughing their who don't care or fight it. Bitcoin is simply a currency and cannot be compared with a bank. The bank work with currencies so bitcoin is (must be) only subject of the work of an bank and the bank cannot be never dependent from bitcoin. This is a total absurdity. To not use more hard words. The banks exist since hundred and hundred years. While bitcoin has only 6 years. How is possible that the banks worked before the born of bitcoin if are dependent from it. Then if I want to have a credit in which way will communicate with bitcoin to have it? make to it a phone call and ask for some bitcoin and then it make a sent of the amount needed from me to my wallet?

People be reasonable in that what write. To many may laugh with your posts and your connections without any sense.

I will say Bitcoin can not survive without financial institutions in future even it has reached and survived but all this was struggle which was directionless.People had doubts about its future without protection and now this adoption and acceptance by financial institution which is making credible and legislation is backing it.Now Bitcoin really needs at least support of financial institutions for rich and bright future.

For now I do think that it can not be that easy for them to operate alone. You see there are some services that the bitcoin depend on financial institutions and even banks. It is just the time for growth and It can not make it far without them.

Normally yes. Is born without asking permit to those and there are six years (since its born) that act and is grow up without having nothing to do with those. So I don't see any reason why must have need for those. If will be accepted by those it will be better because this will increase it more easily and faster and will put in light its potential. But even without those I think that it will continue its way with more increase, more power, more spread and even more importance in the world of the currencies. Anyhow this can be verified only by the time. The only testimonial of every kind of event.

Bitcoin was born without the need of banks so it will survive without the need of banks.
Simple is that.
What is more interesting and important, the banks had been the reason why Bitcoin was created!!!!

I appreciate your concerns and agree that the banks would love to exert some control over the protocol and network. Lucky for us that can't happen.

In the past 6 years a lot of people have worried about a bank takeover of bitcoin. What no one has ever shown me is any plausible way to do it. The only leverage a bank has that I do not have would be their billions of dollars. This is no real advantage though. If they say tried dominating the market by buying all the coins it would drive the price to the moon and strengthen the network for us all.

They cant change the rules of the protocol because the only way for that to happen is to fork the network and create their own valueless alt-coin. They can't control the fees, or production. They can't control who uses it or how it is used. All they can do is participate. IMO, that's ok.

As far as the identity requirements, that is not a bank rule. That is U.S. law.
KYC and AML rules require banks to do due diligence in finding people who are engaged in illegal activities. Of course we could lobby to change those laws also if we wanted.

If you know of a way that banks could "take over" or destroy bitcoin do post it. Perhaps there is a way none of us has considered, but it would be a first.