1) he has already moved over to bitbi9,
2) cryptsy's value is minus 2000btc atleast.. it holds no asset value as the Fincen registration is not with cryptsy.. its with project investors. and vern is not selling project investors. nor is project investors part of any bankruptcy plans... cryptsy is just a limp arm that can be amputated without pain to vern

A lie detector test can be faked and people know how to cheat it. It is for that reason not admissible in a court of law. Some companies still use it but it's not worth anything if you know how to cheat it. They should just continue with the investigation and see what comes out of that.

I never store lots of bitcoins on these services, for this exact reason.

Isn't Cryptsy just a trademark of Project Investors, not a separate legal entity? If so, PI would be directly responsible for any liabilities related to Cryptsy's operations.

Not at all.

but anyone believing his BS story  should take an IQ test, and if in say the top 70 percentile, then get a serious mental health assessment.

Not sure where that came from, is vern a proven psychopath? There are feelings of emotions, it is just not felt the same way as it is in others and does not last as long but that is wrong to say no emotions although right the chances are higher to cheat the test. He would never agree to one to begin with so i dont really care. Another thing even if he was telling the truth he could still easily fail the test which is another reason it is not really used as evidence in a court of law.

Yes, it says so at the foot of Cryptsy's homepage. If Cryptsy goes bankrupt so does Project Investors Inc, but Paul Vernon will probably not be bothered because any debts will belong to Project Investors Inc, not him. He will be more concerned at being prosecuted for all the shady activities reported to have taken place at Cryptsy.

If you're saying Cryptsy should be using their remaining funds to immediately pay out their creditors, I'm not sure that's what legal counsel would advise. You can probably look at Mt Gox's implosion for an idea of how a responsible legal professional would likely advise the remaining funds should be handled: A long-winded legal process where all assets are liquidated by a third party, and creditors reimbursed in FIAT, relative to their outstanding claims as determined by some court. (approximately).

I am most certainly not qualified to give legal advice myself. But the above appears to be what gox's aftermath indicates is the way things are handled.

haha there's nice comment there on youtube: You should pay them another visit. Oh wait, they've vanished without a trace.

Idk, have they? I mean I don't think it's so hard to find someone in today's world. And btw was it a hack?

Lie detectors test have been to be really inaccurate in the past. I wouldn't trust a lie detector test as definitive proof that someone is telling the truth or not, it's just not fair. In any case, I don't believe any exchange, I think its always an inside job.

The lie detector test may result wrong in both ways, it is something probabilistic at best.

We should look for facts and evidences that would not require trust in any person or questionable methods