Even I can read that.

by the way i have seen all their stuff, i read the roadmap, i read every bip, i have talked to dev's and i have put all that stuff into real life scenario's using logic.
im not a band camp advocate for gavincoin or blockstream. i just want bitcoin to have a bigger buffer to allow growth.

but your endless reputation attacks are meaningless waffle that just distract people from the code debate.. which also means your not using the logic part of your brain and instead using the distraction techniques to delay growth discussions.

the funny thing is that when people point out the code needs debating, instead of answering the question you try to debunk them as knowing anything.. again your distraction technique.

you prefer to avoid questions that might harm blockstreams plans.

i do hope you enjoy your "liquid" coins you have probably been promised in exchange for defending blockstream endlessly

have a nice day

Actually I think I'm just going to ignore you and your merry men and get on with more interesting stuff like programming.

Unfortunately some people here are just extremely determined to "rant and shout" in multiple topics in the hope that it will garner support and I am not one of those.

I continue to believe its imperative that the block size remain at 1MB until transaction fees plus the rapidly decreasing block rewards are enough to ensure our mining community is incentivized enough to be continuously reinvesting in the best state of the art hardware to maintain our network security. This is a short term situation that will diminish as the user base grows (smaller fees but more transaction fees) and our network bandwidth and latency improves with technological advancements over the coming years.  Keeping the limit in place is the safest way forward however I admit higher fees will push micro transactions off the network, this will be a huge blow but we will survive. I believe in time we can raise the block size manually with hard forks with universal community support if we do it in small 5% increments only when fees become detrimental to adoption until the day comes when we have so many users even a 1Cent fee is enough to ensure our security but that day is still far, far off in a unknowable future.  

even with a 2mb limit.. miners dont need to fill that limit..

EG at the moment with 1mb
miners let in 500k-700k of fee paying transactions. and then a handful of free transactions if generous..

some miners (antpool) have been known to prefer to only fill 200k or 700k per block. i really dont see why people still think that 2mb limit means 1.99mb of data for every block in some doomsday scenario..

so, back to the 2mb blocklimit.
miners that want to add more transactions will have 1.005mb of data as their first toe in the water test on processing times.. and when they are comfortable to process transactions without much lag compared to competitors, they will slowly increase adding a few extra transactions to test how fast they can process data.

there is no 0.99 or 1.99 (only 2 choices).. data can be anything from 250bytes all the way upto 1.99megabytes.. and any amount they want in between..

the 2mb rule is just a buffer to allow growth.. not a hard rule that forces miners to need to push through 1.99mb of data.

so even with a 2mb limit your idea works as the miners can then test their limits and increase to add more transactions as they are good and ready

Again, the cost of digging out gold does not have anything to do with the transaction cost of the gold, when gold is dig, miners will leave, if the fee does not rise enough high

FED just printed several trillions of dollars, it does mean that it costs several trillions to do transactions in USD

Anyway, talk here does not mean anything, you can not generate hash power by talk, those who have invested millions and millions dollar and years and years of work building mining farms now finally can have some advantage in this political game

The latest consensus from chinese mining community is 2MB hard fork at 90% threshold

https://bikeji.com/t/3172