You won't find a project in Crypto that is already finished and big business. All big projects are work in progress and about future potential. Or do you believe Ethereum is already worth it's marketcap for real? Or Factom, my favorite, also not the system yet it will be after the release of the full protocol.
The question is not, if a system is perfect at launch. No project ever was, and Ethereum was pretty scary btw. (and still is in my opinion). The question is, if a team has the ability to realize what is planned - and if they are able to work hard, if they are serious and legit. And of course it's also about the potential business-model.
The thing is: If you analyze all this in LISK, there may be weak points like everywhere. But what I'm totally sure about: The idea has a lot of potential. The team is legit and hard working and growing. And they have a plan.
Just for example: Many believe the marketing is just about the price. But it's not. It's out of the conclusion that a project needs attention, not just because of exchanges and trading, but even more to grow, to attract Devs to develop for LISK. And the combination of a lot of attention and financial incentive (not too cheap prices) is very promising.
If it will work out as planned, and if they are able to avoid mistakes that would be hard to solve, LISK has a lot of potential. In short- and even more in longterm.
indeed ive never once said ethereum should be where it is. if it is you thank whales. ive just pulled out a weak point something i noticed and have said they have money to close these flaws. others saying if they set it up wrong but shouldn't the funds be protected from the start why does lisk even give developers the option to "SET IT UP CORRECTLY". then they say dapps when the owner can run off with the funds. if they set it up correctly then it won't be misused but if it isn't bye bye user's funds.
max even said he is working on this to make it more trustless
