Sorry guys. The installation routine is way to complicated. Ok as a developer it is no problem, but you targeted DAUs as well with the ICO.
They have a lot of work to do. A lot. Making a more user friendly local wallet is one of them.
The main problem is that even with this month long delay it simply wasn't enough time to do some things that otherwise would've been done by launch.
It was unexpected how much improvement Crypti needed that was essential to do before Lisk launch, so development effort was redirected by this from other thinks like making user friendly solutions.
Those of us who followed the testnet and dealt with running, testing, updating, etc the delegate nodes, it wasn't a suprise, but the opposite. We considere it a very successful launch, because the network held up, the nodes are synced, Lisk handled a great amount of transactions at launch and since then.
I'm understand why ppl are angry. They expected a finished product (for some reason), that works flawlessly, yet they didn't get it, from their perspective.
This could have been avoided or at least mitigated if a precise time to launch (with timer and everything) wasn't given.
Ironically it also didn't help that both big altocoin exchange was ready and even pre-announced adding Lisk.
For the common of people, let's say, all those are "final users" normally don't know and it doesn't matter for them most of the hard work that's behind. Yes! wallet for windows users it's a must, options for Linux and iOs are welcome but c'mon!, are not the more biggest used (I am not Win10 fan).
LISK is alive, we've exchanges, nodes, the devs seems that are not on Caribean (for now) and we are on
http://coinmarketcap.com/. So it's time to the next thing (my
humble opinion).