That article contains information that is not true.
"So far, the team has completed their crowdsale, resulting in a US$5.75m round. However, as the Bitcoin price increased since that time, they are now sitting at a US$9.1m valuation. This also goes to show why it is important to hold on to Bitcoin funds after a crowdsale, instead of converting it to fiat currency right away."Well that is just his opinion.
Which is not based on fact.
If ethereum sold its bitcoins right after the crowdsale they would have got alot more money to spend on the development instead of losing alot of money to the falling bitcoin price at that time.
Many other coins faced this problem too.
Lisk was just lucky to have bitcoin go up.
"Some exchanges have opened up alternative trading markets for Lisk. Poloniex, for instance, lets users trade LSK against ETH and USDT."
That is another false statement. Poloniex allows LSK trading in only LSK/BTC and LSK/ETH.
I think JP Buntinx just writes in a way where his articles meet a certain amount of words per article and he doesn't check if info is true or not.
I really don't know why this is making me angry but I just had to write this post.
You're right, some facts are not correct.
Thank you for your comment.