It's obvious that you are a Lisk bagholder, you don't seem to be involved technically, which is completely fine, I'm a bagholder of several alts. But be careful defending any alt crypto, people will be very angry if it does turn out to be a scam or if the devs simply just walk away, which is a real possibility here.

Maybe. Maybe I sold after the ICO and bought back later? Who knows?
Right, I'm not involved in the team. Everything on my own account. And everyone knows that. Who then gets angry with me, would wasting his time.


I would give you the same offer: see us in 1 - 2 years again and then we'll see which of us had two of the better instinct.

People who write something like this have no manners. And in reality they are selfless little assholes, sorry this is my opinion.

Kordek took so much BTC for project and cannot develop Lisk properly.

He is wasting 2nd time (first was Crypti!) people's money, faith, time, and you are talking about manners?

OMG I see something like Stockholm syndrome. Rare in crypto, mostly in bagholders denial.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

WAKE UP, you are wasting energy with Lisk. There're many better projects to be part of it as a investor, trader, coder or pr guy.

It's really sad, you must wake up, Lisk is not good, Lisk is fail for now... Maybe will reborn like phoenix but don't bet on that too easy...

Yes you're an idiot.... read the latest financial statement before posting total non sense.

Max and Oliver stated during the ICO that their motivation to fork Crypti was the unacceptably slow rate of progress of that project, that it was taking far too long to get to the market, and that they were deeply frustrated by it. That is what really hacks me off about their conduct with Lisk, a project that will clearly take even longer to reach the market than Crypti.

Max and Oliver stated during the ICO that their motivation to fork Crypti was the unacceptably slow rate of progress of that project, that it was taking far too long to get to the market, and that they were deeply frustrated by it. That is what really hacks me off about their conduct with Lisk, a project that will clearly take even longer to reach the market than Crypti.

The Future is Bright for Lisk


Last night, one of our advisors officially resigned from his position on the Board of Advisors for the Lisk Foundation. We (Max and Oliver) would like to begin this post by thanking our former advisor, Charles Hoskinson, for the sage advice and counsel he provided us over these past few months.

We would like to also use this opportunity to update the community on the positive relationship between Lisk and its Board of Advisors, an important circle of influencers and leaders who will continue to provide us with wisdom and experience.


Our views on advisors

We believe there are two types of advisors: active and passive. Active advisors constantly contact the management board and advise as they see fit. Passive advisors wait until the management board asks for advice, for the time being they therefore stay silent. We are lucky to have advisors who have taken an active role in providing us with counsel, even during the times when we made a conscious decision to go in a different direction.
...


Read the complete blog article


RT: https://twitter.com/LiskHQ/status/837238317074743296