there also the best coin called zcash out in months without asking money or ico.
Decred also wasn't ico....they give free btc instead to airdropper and a 21 teams member.
Eth is about 40 teams member since start.

What is here? 2 developers from a dead coin called crypty and 1 community member?

With 7 millions fund i expect a little more effort.

It' not fud, cause there is no exchange. It's just talking explaining some fear.

I think the devs know that their ico systems has bugs... the validation option is not created for our fun...it is required because the know about some ico generation bugs.

Assuming you invested here, you knew ahead of time what you were investing in. Complaining about the size of the dev team now is just silly.

ETH had a long delay. Iota has been delayed for months (I think). Plenty of ICOs delay for months and months (remember NEM, how long was that delay before release, like a year+)?

A couple of weeks won't kill you.

It is a good move for the delayed launch, because even in the testnet there were not 101 active delegates (real ones   )
For more security it is much better this way. And every active delegate should learn to do a good job in this time.

I prefer to have a well working environment. And like others mentioned before -> the 11th of April was not a fix date.

Good evening
Area

You complain a lot.

they delayed the start because there are no real dapps running. for what do you need a shipyard, when you have no ships?

Eth is a smart contracts platform and they had several projects already developing Dapp before they even startet.

When they start now, it will crash down the hill like Crypti

I generated my keys but now it says I have to confirm them wtf is this a phishing email?

cant believe you didnt generated your keys until now.

stopped reading then, sorry, i missed something.

I'm not phased by a delay. I waited on eth for a year. So this is nothing to cry about.

Guys I don't understand it. Why should I risk security issues again. I saved the file. Is there really the possibility that its wrong? Kidding me?
With bitcoin you try to make paperwallets offline to be sure, that there is no hacking possibility and I should repeatedly risk it here?