I think the "Known Alts of Members" thread just serves the purpose .You don' have to waste your time additionally giving a feedback to the alt account unless the owner has been doing something shady.Moreover ,having alt accounts is not against any forum rules,if member is dealing with another member in any sort of trades,its his job to check the respective threads for the alts and that include the campaign managers.Leaving a feedback,even if neutral ,would be as useful as its absence there.

I voted for "Neutral - to warn others" in general, before any shady activity done by the owner of both main account + Alt account since I believe that's the appropriate action on this matter. But if any of the associated accounts that are in control by the same owner, happen to scam anyone and proven a scammer then those involved accounts plus the main account of the owner, deserves a negative rating in order to help prevent further scams. Any other rating being left from any users regardless of mentioned two cases above is most likely not necessary and more likely annoying to most.

I voted for "Neutral - to warn others", but only for people who arent a scammer.
If they are a scammer, the negative.
Edit: Realized I voted for the wrong thing

I've added Negative for scammers, neutral for all others. to the poll.  I can't seem to change to "allow voters to change their vote" for anyone who might want to select this option.

There is a reset to zero option - but that'd mean holding a quick poll-within-a-poll to see if I should reset it. 

reset it! we can revote until we have voted the correct result, i mean the one you like, i mean.... ähhhhhh....

I voted Negative - providing they are proven scammers only,their are reason why they have alt account one of them is their account got hacked or they are on signature campaign,unless you can prove that the reason why they have alt accounts is just to scam people

Time for a bump.  There's new investigators who may not have seen this thread when it was first posted.

Basically, the question is what trust to leave when uncovering alts?

1.Make sure the proofs of the found alts are concrete and considered valid by everyone.
2.If the accounts connected are debatable and the given proofs just not satisfy the connections,no feedback should be left.
3.Under satisfactory conditions with cross verifying if the account connected has been sold or not :-
   

I think shorena's post is the best thing to do unless there is some different situation in a case.



In such conditions one may post some proofs to unlink himself from the accounts connected and get ratings removed if any.