This is great. This thread gives you perspective of what the future could look like.

180 000$ pizza. yammy...  could be more expensive than the house it was consumed in

It's almost like hitting the lottery, god damn if you were the guy who got those 10k and just forgot about them.  Only to check back in one year, and then realized you reformatted your PC with your wallet on it.

I will gladly send you 2 pizzas for $270,000 worth of BTC. 

I'll pay 10 pizzas will everything on them, for 10,000 bitcoins. I made Lazlos deal pale in comparison.

that's a 150.000 $ pizza now..

I thought I would look for the pizza-purchase transaction. There are two candidate transactions. Both of them are for 10,000 BTC on 22 May 2010:

http://blockexplorer.com/address/1CZDM6oTttND6WPdt3D6bydo7DYKzd9Qik
http://blockexplorer.com/address/17SkEw2md5avVNyYgj6RiXuQKNwkXaxFyQ

According to Bitcoin Block Explorer, both of these transactions were spent as "Strange" transactions. The first one (above) was spent a day later, the second one was spent in the very next block after it was received.

What does it mean for a transaction to be "Strange"? Strangeness doesn't seem to have stopped the transaction outputs being spent again later.

Yes for sure, it would not be a surprise if laszlo and/or jercos were using non-standard clients. But lots of transactions come from non-standard clients yet are not marked "Strange". So there must be something unusual about the data itself, and there may be some interesting consequence.

Might want to update the tooltip as well