Why would I attempt that. There isn't any purpose for that stuff, except to attempt to thwart God. I'm surprised that you don't have the answers, since you are the one who is trying to thwart God.

You are dense. Your argument is that homosexuality is wrong because it has no ''purpose'' however there are a ton of things without a ''purpose'' like those mentioned there and yet the bible doesn't tell people to kill other people if they stick a finger up their butt, does it?

Anyhow, why would it be justified to kill people just because they are doing things without purpose? Psychopath..

(1) Homosexuality is a preventable disability.

He defends (1) in two parts. Firstly, he considers homosexuality a disability because it is deprived of something which heterosexuality possesses. In his words:

"The first things to recognise is that homosexuality is a disability. For a homosexual is unable to enter into a loving relationship in which the love is as such procreative."

Secondly, he thinks this deprivation is preventable. He cites various studies which indicate homosexuality is due to both genetics and environmental factors. Swinburne writes:

"The consensus of the scientific community is that both genetic constitution and social factors interact to produce homosexuality. The social factors may include Freudian-type factors (over-involved mother and cold father causing male homosexuality, etc.) and the absence of gender-specific education and dress; but they will also surely include the acceptability of homosexual practice among peers and society more widely."

Thus, if we foster a climate which inhibits the development of homosexuality, Swinburne thinks fewer potential homosexuals will become actual homosexuals (and grow instead into heterosexuals).

(2) Disabilities ought to be prevented and cured.

Typically, Swinburne thinks we seek to reduce disabilities as far as we can. For instance, suppose  we know a baby has a condition which will very likely result in his loss of limbs some years later. Soon after, someone discovers a medication which will significantly reduce the chances of him losing his limbs. We would administer that medication to the baby. On the flipside, if someone does what worsens the baby’s condition, it would seem a bad thing.

(3) Homosexuality ought to be prevented and cured.

Given (1) and (2), it follows that we should prevent and cure homosexuality. Thus Swinburne urges:

"So part of both prevention and cure (where that is now possible) must consist in deterring homosexuals from committing homosexual acts. Homosexuals can help to prevent the spread of homosexuality and help to cure others by setting an example of not indulging their inclinations and of seeking a cure."

''and there are a ton of wrong things, homosexuality among them, right?'' No, doing things without a reproductive purpose isn't wrong. - That's a judgment call, not necessarily a fact.

''committing their sin.'' But you haven't answered why homosexuality is a sin, it's not because it doesn't have a ''purpose''.
- I most certainly answered it, above. It's because God stated that it is a sin in the Bible, and I offered two examples; there are more. The purpose is to be happy just like masturbating or drinking coca cola.
- God did not state that drinking Coca Cola or that masturbation are sins. But He DID state that the act of homosexuality is. Not everything needs to have a reproductive purpose. You have no argument of why homosexuality is wrong.

Bro, that comes not even close as a good argument to kill homosexuals or to view homosexuality as a sin. Someone infertile is also disabled then, should we kill them too? What about, I don't know, dudes who can't get erect, should we kill them too? If homosexuality was viewed as a disability in the bible, shouldn't god say, hey, let's try to fix them instead of JUST FUCKING MURDER THEM? Give me a fucking break.

I don't view homosexuality as evil. You have no argument. His argument doesn't say homosexuals are evil, it says they can't have children. Plenty of people can't have children or wont have children, it's their choice. You still have not answer, why is homosexuality evil or a sin? Again, saying it's ''unnatural'' doesn't make it evil and you haven't defined unnatural.

Just admit it, you don't like gay people and you want to kill them.

Bro, that comes not even close as a good argument to kill homosexuals or to view homosexuality as a sin. Someone infertile is also disabled then, should we kill them too? What about, I don't know, dudes who can't get erect, should we kill them too? If homosexuality was viewed as a disability in the bible, shouldn't god say, hey, let's try to fix them instead of JUST FUCKING MURDER THEM? Give me a fucking break.

How can you be this blind, you are the one saying the bible is divinely inspired yet you don't agree with it, mind boggling. ''Tragedy, however, does not necessarily mean we should celebrate or normalize male homosexuality'' Yes we do, it happens, just like infertility or other disabilities.

''to avoid becoming a biological dead end. '' Not everyone wants children and having children is not necessarily a good thing.

''One possible reasons for this could be that these types promiscuity lead to cultural upheaval and decay '' No, the reason is clear, the minds of the people who wrote the bible were primitive and viewed homosexuality as wrong for no real reason, the bible is full of shit and you seem to agree with me so why do you still believe in it.

Swimming by yourself around the world is not only 'more difficult' but impossible.  We don't call people disabled because of that.
Another example is flying from one continent to another.  You and I are not disabled because we cannot jump in the air, move our hands and fly from Europe to America.  We go online buy a ticket and go and fly to America or Europe.

We have the technology to accomplish these tasks.

Same for gay men and their desire to reproduce.  They can pick the female they want to have a child with by selecting her from a catalog.
It is hardly a disability.  Straight men do it all the time.

If I were Swinburne, I would ask Oxford to return my tuition.