Lauda said "as long as you don't break the rules" but her very next sentence says to break the rules "[...]follow you around[...]try to[...]troll you[...]"


Which is it. Does Lauda not want him to break the rules, or does Lauda want him to troll?

@Vod -- You must not understand the concept behind free speech and freedom from being oppressed when making unpopular/critical (of those in power) statements. I know that you can't think for yourself, but at least give others the chance to think for themselves. Please and thank you.

Would you please take a history lesson before posting shit like this?? Holocaust had nothing to do with "Free speech"...

i cant belive it....

Lauda is a long time contributor and fair moderator.

Are you really already complaining with less than 20 posts in gorgon666?
And creating an entire thread  to do so? No examples just accusations.

Settle in a bit gorgo666, you might like it here...or not ;-)
but try to "play nice" just the same because so far you're not off to a good start.

You have comprehension issues. Cats do not encourage people to troll.

It was a one time thing to a person not directly requesting my help (I'd never do it in such a case). Anyhow, it was (most likely) retracted before the OP could read it.

I wouldn't go that far.

But I do think guilty of over zealous posting, which blur's the mod role he performs.
Seems like every other post is Lauda saying either you are right or you are wrong.
It's too in your face.
It stifles discussion and aids trolling.

What's all this about for example?
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1164464.60
Lauda's comment totally uncalled for, imo. Leading to at least 3 of the 5 following posts off topic spam/trolling.
(has VeritasSapere done something wrong?)

Not trying to be confrontational here, just saying,
Can't Lauda bite his tongue occasionally?

WAIT!! If you guys remove Lauda as moderator i QUIT!
Anyways OP: Lauda is one of the few persons here that dare to express their ideas without looking at your rank, trust, donations, skin color, avatar, signature or any other potential "pre-judgement". If what you say is stupid, expect Lauda to write it down with caps and viceversa: if you smart enough to contribute to this forum with constructive posts, expect Lauda to back you up without if and without but. And i like this attitude and fortunately i see the same attitude from a lot of other people here.
If you knew it, you woudnt make a new account just to run your mouth but instead, you would have risked some of your red trust with your Legendary "avatar" and write about Lauda with him
~Hamu

I think Lauda regardless if the person is (Male or Female) is Level headed.......While opinionated He/She has the right to be so.

He/she and i have butted heads on a few issues and we came to an an understanding to disagree.

There is NO reason whatsoever that He/She should be even considered being removed from Moderator status at all.
I say NO NO NO!


P.S.   Dogs are better than Cats Lauda No offense RUFF RUFF

Only the hamburger on Lauda's avatar irritates me, other than that never had any issues.
Seems like OP had felt personally attacked or something in the past.

I disagree. Lauda is not pissing off nearly enough assholes yet to qualify for global mod.