Its funny because when i asked a guy here that he supports coin distribution, he avoided answering me, so I take that for a yes.

Bitcoin Classic would start implementing marxist BIPS in notime if they would get in charge, and would start redistributing coins as well.

Well they think that they have the solution to move bitcoin forward, however they way that they try to promote their agenda is by spreading FUD. Like that's going to work somehow. It's a double edged sword and they might cut themselves with that strategy.

Things changed, Bitcoin Classic has very ambitious roadmap to my opinion (even though part of the features are from other teams like Bitcoin Unlimited), but if they deliver their roadplan as promised, Bitcoin Classic can help progressing Bitcoin in the right direction.

If anybody not familiar with Bitcoin Classic roadmap and is interested to check it, here is the link:
https://github.com/bitcoinclassic/documentation/blob/master/roadmap/roadmap2016.md

No. This roadmap has nothing specific on it. Additionally, they don't have evidence that support that dynamic block size limit proposal right now. That could end terribly if not properly designed and tested.

It is not just the unwillingness to make compromises. The main problem for which the subreddit is useless is that they're being constantly negative and constantly use ad hominem and whatnot to undermine several people (e.g. Core developers as you've mentioned). Usually, anyone who disagrees with their view will get bashed.

I am usually paying more than 15.000 satoshi/ transaction and I have never once complained about the fees. I think they are fair, given how important bitcoin is for humanity.

But the classic supporters are constantly moaning about a 2500 satoshi fee, like 5 year old crybabies. No wonder nobody takes them seriously.

They are totalitarian scum, and they have the guts to call us totalitarian? It's just lunacy.

It's just pure maddness what goes on there. Bitcoin classic supporters must be mentally ill or something to not see through their leaders agenda, or they are consciously supporting it.


Note his username is: utopiawesome, they are totalitarian communists!

It's even worse than that, now it's evident that some people there are totalitarian communists, that use censorship and propaganda to move their agenda.

What is their next step? Calling for core users to be put in a gulag? I would not be surprised.

They are totalitarians, with anti-human, anti-liberty ideas, and certainly anti-free market.

I would avoid any contact with a classic supporter, their mad ideas are contagious.

Very well put. reddit.com/r/btc is basically like communism, bed bugs, and AIDS, all piled up in a fail sandwich.

I mean, miners setting their own blockspace production levels?!? It's so anti-market, it makes one's head spin.

Thankfully, we have the One True Implementation, and the selfless priesthood that shepherds it... They promise to guide us to a land of perpetual harvest, supplying the tools to make an uncensorable, decentralised, central bank settlement fantasy... a reality. Join me on this journey friends... will you?

I read a bit of it on reddit, within secs I closed my reddit browser tab and read other shts instead.

segwit AKA core AKA blockstream AKA PwC AKA corporations and banks initially was promoted as a malleability fix.
yet.
they added RBF.. at the same time as promoting segwit, thus fixing malleability (to make zero confirms trustworthy again) is again a futile thing to do again
meaning people can still mess with transactions before confirmation and no one should trust zero confirms even after segwit.

then they tweaked it to bloat up the transaction while not delivering more capacity, then they realised that the tweak could allow more capacity as a sideeffect,
but.. then they want to bloat up the transaction with payment codes rendering nodes unable to act as a transparent ledger that can account for funds because the funds are hidden.
then reinvent the node as being a lite no witness pruned edition so that there is even less chance of being a full node..

core is as bad as classic.. do not blindly trust any corporate controlled dev team. and trust me that $55mill of blockstreams is not just being used by a couple people who have no control of the code.. atleast think logically,