U dont quite believe that tho

~CfA~

I actually do. If I was smart, I would never have posted in this forum starting in 2013. My life would have been much better.

More important question is: who will Shelby vote for?

Trump or...?

Been following Annonymint on and off since ... god ... 2013?

He thinks the world economy is going to collapse.  He thinks crypto may be the answer.

Respect.  Worship.

He will launch his own coin.  Or continue the whiplash of getting into spats with everyone.

I could write a six paragraph autobiography on him ... but don't have time.

I imagine it's pretty complicated--I've been working on a poem for a decade now (not the only one), but every version changes a bit and I spend time away from it and then I change it dramatically and then it sits and then it seems perfect and the next day, WTF it reads like crap and on and on and on...... And that's only 7 pages, not an entire network, so maybe, it will take some time to get the project he wants on his terms?

Personally I'm very interested in a project that he creates I would like to see less of trying to critisize or "structure" others and more development of a project that adds something to the community. That's my personal opinion.

“To destroy is easier than to create, and that is why so many people are ready to demonstrate against what they reject. But what would they say if one asked them what they wanted instead?” - Ivan Klima

Let's be serious. He is smarter than the vast majority here. Anyone voting he is not smart should reveal themselves so they can have a conceptual debate with him over something in public. Very few would head him off. I believe only those tiny % that are math wizards would have a chance if they can keep the debate in their purely maths expressed/orientated domain.

He may not be a pure math boffin. However, with regard conceptual thought he is a cut above 99.+% here. I have yet to see him lose a debate based upon observable events and the logical conclusions one would draw from them.

Yes, there are some real math wizards here. There are those that will hail to the belief that unless you're able to use math at the highest of levels you are not the smartest of the smart. Even so if the entire board was to vote here and use their "smart level" as a basis for this poll it would be 99 votes to smart vs 1 to not that smart. Perhaps greater even than that.

Even so, this thread is pointless. Anyone who has read his posts from the start will know.

1. he is smarter than most
2. he is outspoken and rubs some up the wrong way

Is he the very smartest person on this board? if he had more time spent in pure maths based pursuits and education?? who can say.

Who will know this apart from the very smartest here? so you are asking a handful of people to give their opinions on something 99.999% of the board will never be able to validate.

That is not the only logical explanation.