Bitcointalk Mobile Browser presented by IRLBTC™

May 03, 2016, 06:18:20 PM

#541

What if the real Satoshi was "erased" and been stolen all is personal files?

ALERT, THIS IS NOT THE REAL SATOSHI! I CAN FEEL IT...

Gyrsur

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520

Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206

Quote from: AlexGR on May 03, 2016, 06:13:52 PM

May 03, 2016, 06:20:53 PM

#542

I believe the closest we have to Satoshi these last years, is this: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html

That particular email is not known to be hacked (but we can't say for sure that it isn't), there is no spoofing involved, and he also had to register and verify the email to the mailing list:

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010329.html
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010327.html
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010334.html

The writing style and essence of what is written does not have any troll like qualities like the spoofed "I'm not craig wright, we are all satoshi" message that appeared a few months later. The August one isn't spoofed, it is serious and consistent in writing style, while also trying to "sneak in" some comment of concern for bitcoin itself - as far as node incentives go. Kind'a like, since I broke my silence, let me also say this that is bothering me for a while.

As far as I'm concerned it is legit with very high probability. Which, in turn, would imply that if I'm right then Satoshi was alive a few months ago. It would also imply that Craig Wright writing with one space, instead of two, is fraudulent, and that no writing style change has occurred for Satoshi, despite the passing of time since 2010.

SN biggest mistake? Gavin Andresen!!

let us watch what is coming next from mr. wright. with the logic above in mind it is not "big blocks".

Clark Moody's Bitcoin Dashboard

chek2fire

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 1142

Intergalactic Conciliator

May 03, 2016, 06:22:11 PM

#543

Matonis it seems to be the official speakerman of this Wrightamoto scammer. He tweet about him and support him. What are the doing and cant they see the evidence that this guy is a scammer. And where this guy take the title as a "doctor"?

http://www.bitcoin-gr.org
4411 804B 0181 F444 ADBD 01D4 0664 00E4 37E7 228E

AGD

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2070
Merit: 1170

Keeper of the Private Key

May 03, 2016, 06:25:37 PM

#544

Mike Hearn has nothing to say?

Bitcoin is not a bubble, it's the pin!
+++ GPG Public key FFBD756C24B54962E6A772EA1C680D74DB714D40 +++ http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1C680D74DB714D40

stereotype

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000

May 03, 2016, 06:26:53 PM

#545

On the edge of my seat here.....

"The next communication that Paige and Conrad received from Wright was stranger still. Emails provided to Gizmodo, the authenticity of which were confirmed by Paige and Conrad, show that in February 2014, 10 months after Kleimans death, Wright emailed the pair to tell them about a mysterious project hed been working on with their friend. As part of this undertaking, Wright wrote, Kleiman had mined an enormous amount of bitcoinsan amount too large to email. Wright asked them to ensure that Kleimans computers were safe, and to check whether their hard drives contained wallet.dat files, the pieces of software that contain bitcoins and their owners account information. On a subsequent phone call with Wright, a baffled Paige asked for more information about the partnership with Kleiman. After that, he said, Wright assumed a clandestine tone. Can I trust you?

According to Paige, Wright eventually told him that Kleiman was the creator of Bitcoin......"

http://gizmodo.com/this-australian-says-he-and-his-dead-friend-invented-bi-1746958692

RawDog (OP)

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026

Quote from: Gyrsur on May 03, 2016, 05:53:57 PM

May 03, 2016, 06:47:45 PM

#546

Quote from: PinkLlama on May 03, 2016, 05:51:22 PM

Satoshi is dead?

not very unlikely. hal finney passed away unfortunetly.

[/quote]
Finney - dead; Kleiman - dead; Satoshi - dead;

How did all the inventors of bitcoin get dead already?

*Image Removed* *Expletive Removed* *Obsenity Removed*
What's going on - Slavetards?!!!
Watch my videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE43M1Z8Iew 1FuckYouc6zrtHbnqcHdhrSVhcxgpJgfds

pawel7777

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2982
Merit: 1740

The largest #BITCOINPOKER site to this day

Quote from: kingcolex on May 03, 2016, 06:30:16 PM

May 03, 2016, 06:52:04 PM

#547

....

Probably more likely is Gavin and Wright are conspiring together.

So far CSW is labeled a fraud, until he delivers and GA's credibility suffered a massive blow. That would be a very poor conspiracy with an easy to predict outcome.

As per Economist article, it only took 90 minutes to debunk CSW's 'proof'. You may like/respect Gavin or not, but there's no way he would willingly bet his credibility on what CSW published. He got duped big time, or there's more to that story.

BITCOIN
POKER

♠ ♦ ♥ ♣

ANONYMOUS. LOW RAKE. FAST CASHOUTS
DAILY TOURNAMENTS | CASH GAMES | 24/7 FREEROLLS

♠ ♦ ♥ ♣

EST.
2015

^PLAY NOW

tmfp

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737

"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 05:59:06 PM

May 03, 2016, 06:55:11 PM

#548

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Finney_(computer_scientist)

Quote

Hal Finney died in Phoenix August 28, 2014 and was cryopreserved by the Alcor Life Extension Foundation.

well i'll be damned.

There's a quite poignant thread on here from Hal Finney which you've probably read but I only found recently, where he says

Quote

Today, Satoshi's true identity has become a mystery. But at the time, I thought I was dealing with a young man of Japanese ancestry who was very smart and sincere.

Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence

stereotype

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000

Quote from: RawDog on May 03, 2016, 06:47:45 PM

May 03, 2016, 06:57:57 PM

#549

Quote from: Gyrsur on May 03, 2016, 05:53:57 PM

Quote from: PinkLlama on May 03, 2016, 05:51:22 PM

Satoshi is dead?

not very unlikely. hal finney passed away unfortunetly.

Finney - dead; Kleiman - dead; Satoshi - dead;

How did all the inventors of bitcoin get dead already?

Cue the conspiracy theories Lips sealed

adamstgBit

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038

Trusted Bitcoiner

May 03, 2016, 07:09:50 PM

#550

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 05:08:37 PM

he was only giving an example of how to verify a sig not provide proof of being satoshi

I think you should just look at Coblee's post (no need for the big song and dance and especially showing a bunch of console stuff that is meaningless to 99.9% of people).

This is simply typical misdirection.

And if you are so sure that this guy is Satoshi would you care to take a (say 10 BTC) bet on it?

who is Coblee, no matter lets go to the source.

http://www.drcraigwright.net/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance/

Quote

In the remainder of this post, I will explain the process of verifying a set of cryptographic keys.

there you have it!

are you willing to bet 10BTC that he isn't satoshi thats the question.

Relax and Enjoy Live Shows for Bitcoin
✲ Tip Hot Girls Online with Bitcoin ✲ Accepts Bitcoin or Dogecoin and many more! ✲

adamstgBit

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038

Trusted Bitcoiner

Quote from: kingcolex on May 03, 2016, 07:12:58 PM

May 03, 2016, 07:17:44 PM

#551

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 07:09:50 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 05:08:37 PM

he was only giving an example of how to verify a sig not provide proof of being satoshi

who is Coblee, no matter lets go to the source.

http://www.drcraigwright.net/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance/

Quote

In the remainder of this post, I will explain the process of verifying a set of cryptographic keys.

there you have it!

are you willing to bet 10BTC that he isn't satoshi thats the question.

Coblee is the creator of Litecoin who signed his genesis block address and tweeted it.

ya well Satoshi's way is way more interesting.

i find myself nervously eating everything in the house as i await the his next epic post

Relax and Enjoy Live Shows for Bitcoin
✲ Tip Hot Girls Online with Bitcoin ✲ Accepts Bitcoin or Dogecoin and many more! ✲

AlexGR

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049

Quote from: LiteCoinGuy on May 02, 2016, 05:05:21 PM

May 03, 2016, 07:18:42 PM

#552

BUMP:

he should do this:

adamstgBit

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038

Trusted Bitcoiner

Quote from: AlexGR on May 03, 2016, 07:18:42 PM

May 03, 2016, 07:20:17 PM

#553

BUMP:

Quote from: LiteCoinGuy on May 02, 2016, 05:05:21 PM

he should do this:

go home lee your drunk

Relax and Enjoy Live Shows for Bitcoin
✲ Tip Hot Girls Online with Bitcoin ✲ Accepts Bitcoin or Dogecoin and many more! ✲

Gyrsur

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520

Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206

Clark Moody's Bitcoin Dashboard

May 03, 2016, 07:21:02 PM

#554

interesting fact in the book "Digital Gold" from Popper.

Gavin Andresen returned early 2010 from Australia. he claims he heard from Bitcoin thrue a website called InfoWorld.

anybody heard from this article on InfoWorld? maybe he meet mr. wright not for the first time in london.

mexxer-2

Hero Member

Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1008

4 Mana 7/7

May 03, 2016, 07:21:18 PM

#555

Can feel it in my bones, he's not SN. Its just not Satoshi's way

tuvok007

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 07:09:50 PM

May 03, 2016, 07:21:36 PM

#556

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 05:08:37 PM

he was only giving an example of how to verify a sig not provide proof of being satoshi

who is Coblee, no matter lets go to the source.

http://www.drcraigwright.net/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance/

Quote

In the remainder of this post, I will explain the process of verifying a set of cryptographic keys.

there you have it!

are you willing to bet 10BTC that he isn't satoshi thats the question.

I bet 1 btc that he is satoshi but he gave us that stupid proof so that people thinks he is just a ridicule and we all leave him alone.Satoshi is Craig Wright but he wants us to believe that he is definitely not Satoshi.

adamstgBit

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038

Trusted Bitcoiner

Quote from: tuvok007 on May 03, 2016, 07:21:36 PM

May 03, 2016, 07:24:07 PM

#557

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 07:09:50 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on May 03, 2016, 05:08:37 PM

he was only giving an example of how to verify a sig not provide proof of being satoshi

who is Coblee, no matter lets go to the source.

http://www.drcraigwright.net/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance/

Quote

In the remainder of this post, I will explain the process of verifying a set of cryptographic keys.

there you have it!

are you willing to bet 10BTC that he isn't satoshi thats the question.

but now that hes thought about it some more he has decied to go ahead with the full on proof no one can deny.

coming soon a TX from an early block known to be a SN address

Relax and Enjoy Live Shows for Bitcoin
✲ Tip Hot Girls Online with Bitcoin ✲ Accepts Bitcoin or Dogecoin and many more! ✲

Gleb Gamow

In memoriam
VIP
Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145

Quote from: stereotype on May 03, 2016, 09:26:27 AM

May 03, 2016, 07:24:34 PM

#558

Would the anonymous Satoshi, in Jan 2014, change a company name from something very nondescript (Moving Forward in Business LIMITED), to CO1N LTD? Makes no sense. And who is the 24 year old Ms Uyen T Nguyen?

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08248988/filing-history

<don't believe anybody has caught this to date>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Kleiman

Quote

Dave Kleiman (1967 April 26, 2013) was a noted Forensic Computer Investigator, an author/coauthor of multiple books and a noted speaker at security related events. He died in his home in April 2013 of complications from MRSA.

For what it's worth, Dave can still vote in Chicago, mostly likely for Democrats.

Mr Felt

Hero Member

Offline

Activity: 493
Merit: 518

Quote from: Gyrsur on May 03, 2016, 06:20:53 PM

May 03, 2016, 07:25:33 PM

#559

Quote from: AlexGR on May 03, 2016, 06:13:52 PM

SN biggest mistake? Gavin Andresen!!

let us watch what is coming next from mr. wright. with the logic above in mind it is not "big blocks".

Unless Gavin is Satoshi/part of Satoshi. Craig could be proxy or cover for someone or something else, including Gavin, Mantonis, etc. It is clear that the evidence Gavin et al saw was totally different than what came out yesterday. The crowd took the opportunity to bash Gavin, but probably the media deserved more criticism than it got IMHO (the media should know by now its risky to take on a Satoshi reveal article - but I guess BBC didn't get the memo (why'd they choose them anyway, why not a tech journalist or personality who would understand what was happening). Perhaps the intent of yesterday was discredit the media and the traditional news cycle (and manipulators thereof) as a lesson (and assume yesterday was not about discrediting Gavin).

In the alternative, perhaps w/ his tax issues, Craig needs a job and trying to demo his core dev credentials to blockstream. <--- Joke, no ill will intended twd Blockstream.

BCEmporium

Legendary

Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000