eh no. unlike the previous article where they outright said that wright is satoshi, on this one they're pretty much taking a neutral stance. it's more of a about gavin's decision really.

apparentely, that doesnt matter.... hundreds of posts here about "the discovery of the year"  and "we now finally know who is satoshi". and im not even talking about thousands twits about that.
and it was BBC....

Since the real Satoshi didn't stand up and showed the proof about the legitimacy. We can only guess why he didn't stand up this time to show the world Craig Wright is a big lier. Is the big publicity something that withhold him or will there be other things that count.

It'll be funny if Craig posts proof and they fuck up the second time. I start liking him more and more, he's really good at playing everyone. Precisely as Satoshi should be

The whole thing just weirds me out, the guy, the suit, gavin, bbc, etc etc.  Maybe this was the intention to keep that price down because of the halving.

The google searches for Bitcoin went up 200% this week, it's direct benefit to the community whoever this Craig is you don't seem to like puzzles, I used to be like you. Bitcoin is a big joke on this world, its creator should be a big joker of personality. Craig Wright fits this description.

I thought BBC meant Gavin was the expert... Gavin now actually join others and agree that Craig will need to produce convincing evidence by moving Satoshi's coins or sign the key with signAture.... not just any signIture.

This is what happens when some media outlets want to have the hottest news before their competitors. The BBC, the Economist and GQ rushed to publish breaking news on a matter they simply can't fully understand and the Craig Wright fake story blew up spectacularly in their faces. So now that they realized they had written a load of crap BBC are trying to do damage control to their own reputation  

the whole thing was excellent click bait

there has been a million threads here and countless blogs
talking about it. Its like offering a retraction on page 20 of the
newspaper after they sold out.