My apologies, saw that somewhere in this thread. Thank you for the transparency. But let's look at how much BTC your cloud mining can mine in a month, for example.
Aside from those addresses, there are a LOT of shareholders holding 50k, in which case this venture would be profitable as they are receiving the lion's share of the dividends.
Where for people with 10k, that is 0.11%.
I assume your farm is mining BTC? Regardless, even if it's something else, let's make a radical estimate and say that your farm managed to make 5 BTC a month! That is 0.0055 in dividends. On the conservative side, 1 BTC a month would net 0.0011.
What I'm getting at is it's only worth it if you hold a large sum, say 50k or more. Then, if you mined 5 BTC worth in a month, it would net you 0.0315, which is fantastic.
No bitcoin. Is gonna be mined all the most profitable coin at that moment, and then sold in exchange of bitcoin.
Right, so let's presume the constant is 5BTC/month, those with 10k MNM will still receive pennies compared to the higher up accounts.
I know it's fair, the people who invested more obviously have a larger share, but small shares even with 5BTC/month estimates receive very little.
It's a great and fair investment opportunity for those who invest 3 BTC or more. Then you can sit back, relax, and enjoy free money
I can't really follow your reasoning.
A guy with 50k shares will gain 5 times more btc than one with 10k shares? Of course.
The guy with 50k shares paid his shares 5 times the amount paid by the guy with 10k shares? Of course.
The ratio between invested and gain is the same for both guys, everything is proportional, this is a rule that works in every investement on this world, so what's the problem?
