Heading out now, but quick replies and I'll reply in depth later...
Oh, for goodness sake. Many, many people here "promote" this. It's humorous. It's a joke. It's not a get-rich-quick scheme, and no one (well, mostly no one) takes it seriously. I don't personally bother with it, but for those that do it's a bit of harmless fun.
Is that what Madoff said, too?

No, but seriously - when people promote it, they are lending it life/credence, and the bottom line is that it's a classic ponzi scheme. How you FEEL about it is up to anyone(chuckle lulul), but it is what it is.
My point was: it's a Ponzi scheme.
Yours is that that's great fun.
Some might disagree.
Fine, it's a ponzi scheme. It promises a tiny return for a tiny "investment". I'm not worried it's going to bankrupt anyone; my sole concern is that sooner or later someone was bound to see it and think "oh noes! Ponzi! Run away! Warn the world!" Which has just happened here. So, thanks for your warning, I hope no one views it as any reflection on bitcoin or on any of the people who participate in it.
Yeah, right. Try looking around the web and see how many people give away trading analysis. Most charge for it all, some give you "teasers" to encourage you to pay for the whole thing. In any event, trading experience does not equate to "multi-millionaire". I have trading experience (not nearly as much) and I can assure you I'm in no way wealthy.
I know sites, blogs, twitters that would take more time to read than there is time in the day, all "analysing the market". It's not as if they are hard to find, but the use is disputeable with all of them.
As for 'trading experience does not equate to "multi-millionaire"' -
I did not claim that, but anyone who knows how to trade either goes into obscurity and money eventually(and past just double digits) or gets attention. I know, because I know people thus concerned..and none of them ever, ever, EVER asked anyone for money for anything unless they decided to run active tutelage(which I understand when pricey, simply because you have to weigh it against your own opportunity cost and time investment).
What you did was take the claim "12+ years experience" and say: "Anyone who has enough funds and experience to be in the trading game for a decade, trading with real money, has literally got it made." So, apologies, my assumption of "got it made" was "multi-millionaire", but that was purely my assumption. Just like you assumed that experience translates into "got it made".
Right... because until we had margin trading technical analysis was impossible.
That was not my point. My point was simply that with barely a chart history it's rather tough to chart out s/r levels, and without proper market depth(liquidity), reliability of price levels in general becomes questionable. If you can create no-bid/-ask situations much more easily, then prices can go wonky much more easily.
Now
that is approaching a valid criticism. Remember, however, that price depth transcends one exchange.
There are valid criticisms of technical analysis of bitcoin. But these are not them.
Cool, list me some.
Well, you could always search for them rather than ask someone who doesn't necessarily have any criticisms of technical analysis of bitcoin? There have been some recent posts on this, which I found thought-provoking, though I disagreed with them. You'll need to do the searching, however, unless you're prepared to wait until I get back.