One questions: Can you give us more details on how and where will the registration for betas?
I think that up to 10% via PoW be logical. No more, please.
If 70% goes to ICO and 30% to PoW where do the bounties come from?
As we said, in the distribution 0% will go for us as background/premine/developer funds/bounty funds, we believe it would be unfair. All payments will be supported by us from what we gather at ICO.
Hmmm, I'm not too sure why so many people have a problem with devs holding a share of their coin. I agree that it's hard to determine the right amount, but in the end, it gives the devs an incentive to keep working on their coin.
Here is an idea I had regarding dev shares:
There is one ICO in the beginning. The devs keep a relatively big share of the coins, but they are locked by a contract and are sold in not one big, but in multiple following COs*. When this COs will happen is determined before the first ICO, ideally, the coins are either generated at fixed block heights or are locked by smart contracts and released at fixed block heights.
My reasoning behind this is as follows:
1.: It will keep the devs invested, since successful development would increase the amounts collected in the following COs.
2.: Since the releases are fixed, the market can adjust.
(I had additional points, but I'm too tired to articulate them
)
Obviously, the amounts and points in time when those releases are happening need to be determined carefully.
Thoughts?
*Since ICO means "Initial Coin Offering", the others are just "Coin Offernings"
