Can you at least send the 7 btc to Lutpin for the signature bounty?

First some important criticism of the 2 suggested plans, then maybe I can be productive.

looking4thegrail's plan sounds good at first but it has a major flaw that really screws stage 1 people.

Investors must decide if they want in or out BEFORE the coin is released to anyone. You can't wait and see if the coin is a success then decide if you wanted in the ICO.
Example: I'm phase 1 - you can't take a share of my coins and reserve them for yourself. Then you will buy them if they profit or return them to me if they lose money? That is silly as hell.

If you want to give stage 2 investors an Opt in or Opt out second chance, that is fine. But they have to decide before the coin exists. If they don't want them, then they are my coins and I want them up front, not after they are deemed bad.

BoldNinja's plan - They have plenty of resources to start working so giving them 30btc for something that cost 4btc doesn't make sense. They don't need the second half of the entire project's funds until they are working on the second half of the project.

Moving Forward - Wasserman99.. Maybe we can move this forward if you tell us what your Milestones are, then we can talk about the value of each them. What features are you going to deliver for sure? Ocaml smart contracts, Debit cards, colored coins? What order will you do them?

If you wanna refund, you should PM SebastianJu, let him know what you want.

I hope this problem will be resolve asap so that our signature bounty be start to distribute .

You are even lucky that your major concern is only signature campaign bounty but most of the people here have invested a bigger amount of money are in doubts of their investment if it will earn, I think the OP will let them understand on the current situation and investors would be open minded.

Forget about the payment for the signature bounties. wasserman99 do not have so much btc for bounties and he spent it all for ico 2.

I am very disappointed with the ICO!
 Everyone says something else and I miss a clear direction . I think it is better to repay the money .
I have lost confidence in this project .

Not yet, many people feel scammed and want to get refund, some people support wasserman, like kooke, tom and so forth

From my perspective all looks like show from DEVs who want as much money they can without any real work
,once BTC they got then they disappear. Ghost devs behavior is really fishy and puts me in concern that is a classic scam.
For future investors devs where they refuse to work are big red flag also paying bounties like translations and signatures are out of question.
Most honest people pay for work their workers after work is done there is no needed condition besides you need your work to be done.
What is a difference if you pay 7BTC from 1st or 2nd phase ICO ?
If you are worry that 2nd phase investors are risk free that is fine
but that is a reason of those guys that they use escrow to be risk free
that devs will take money and go away never delivering something.

I would divide costs of exchange listing 50%/50% that 4BTC it costs after delivering but not 30BTC.
After delivering working beta wallet 50% after credit cards rest.
We were paying for such features using escrow if we don't need them then escrow users can go bittres and chose random POS coin
while output will be the same.

The amount of black PR delivered by DEVs is enormous.
Without 2nd phase BTC project won't go probably anywhere
and credibility will be almost close  to 0.

I full agree with SJ that you need deliver something as DEV proof of work not only coin generator wallet putted on some exchange.