PascalCoin allows many types of operations. The commonly used "Transaction" operation only allows a single sender to send funds to a single recipient. In the future, this may be changed but there are complications here in terms of fee structuring. Aggregating N transactions into 1 for the fee of 1 transaction may lead to spam/DoS attacks.

That being said, PascalCoin is easily extensible to allow new operations in future. If you have a specific use case in mind, join the slack and discuss with us there (or github feature request).


Thanks,
Herman.

can someone share the wallet?

public key:
3GhhbovVTV1jQNPqRQksQquA2osv8F3YV6jErdUoLLCASHHP6aahf5tELn4zQNCk2SC4PKGwpW67wRw abctaArdyv9TgcVwzRLjcwy

Thanks!

So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. .  Pasa would be a fine name, too.

I think http://getpasa.com/ is more expensive than https://www.pascwallet.com market ... but is your choice 

I think the name is the identity of a good or something that can be known to many people. If the name is changed from the beginning of its birth this will confuse many people. A new name means starting popularity from scratch. Name is not important for coin popularity. But more importantly how the technological developments adopted by the coin are used for many people for various purposes. And more importantly the function of the coin.

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.

Because miners PASA owners do not fully trust the 3rd party PASA market. Because of the lack of confidence that resulted in the amount of PASA supply in the market less than the maximum pasa. Pasa miner owner hopes there is PASA market in gui wallet. Possibly over time of trust will arise and market pasa can be used optimally. While whitepaper V2 mentions the presence of pasa market in the wallet.