Thanks LoyceV and kaicrypzen for the merit. But I would also like to discuss these topics with the Byteball team or Tony. Is there a community manager, who does not copies Twitter posts here only, but also shares an opinion?

Of course, I also know that the website has been relaunched before. But seriously, that was a rebrush (different colors, more mobile friendly, text centered and a few cheap button animations).

Money is an emotional issue and this must also be communicated through the Byteball website. Currently there is no "mass adaption" with this website because it was made by a technician for technicians. The website is similar to an API documentation or a technology wiki! I have been working in the Internet industry for 20 years and I know it when programmers try to design and do marketing ...

Of course, I do not want any stock images to be posted on the website, it needs a good agency that develops a good communication concept for the emotional topic of "new money Byteball". A good concept conveys innovation, security and a "do not miss"-feeling.

Do not get me wrong, but the current communication strategy of the brand "Byteball" must be changed.

It was now admitted that the end of the last outstanding Airdrop was a mistake. Yes, it was a mistake that needs to be corrected urgently. For example, I had an art gallery in Switzerland as a customer who wanted to test bytes for payment. Since the last Airdrop was canceled, although it was announced for months, the customer has lost the confidence and interest in Byteball.
Here was an announcement broken and therefore I advise the Byteball team to bite the bullet and redeem this announcement and make up for the last Airdrop. Otherwise this breach of trust will always accompany Byteball. Someone will always put their finger in the wound.

Another point is the lack of liquidity. Sometimes, when I bought a few bytes, it felt like I had doubled the global trading volume. It is in the nature of things that a means of payment must be liquid. My two cents: Finding new exchanges should be at the top of the priority list for the Byteball team. Better knock on the doors of other exchanges and realize 1-2 new features less or later.

In general, Byteball needs to build up momentum again. Currently, all good news goes down because of the bitcoin down trend. Again, I would like to suggest the following:
Dear Byteball Team, dear Tony, please use the time of the bear market to work out a great communication concept with a good agency. This takes time, including the relaunch of the strategy Web, Twitter, FB ... maybe 6 months. Announce the commissioning of the communication agency. This announcement could already slow down the current down trend. But save some good news until the wind has turned again at Bitcoin. As an indicator you can take, for example, when the Bitcoin price is traded above the 200-day MA.

My hopes for new momentum at Byteball:

a) The new communication strategy will be rolled out
b) the then announced last Airdrop will be made up and thus all old announcements are now really implemented and the confidence restored
c) A new listing on a major exchange frame the first two points

>> Byteball is sure to be back on everyone's lips, a top topic and the Top50 only a first stopover.

Hi Tonych, are you accepting new users for the cashback program? I see the possibility of getting hundreds/thousands of customers to purchase everyday items using bytes. That way, we could ignite interest in a group of previous "non-users". I filled some google form in a medium article for this purpose three weeks ago, but it seems that channel is not being monitored.

Take a look at BISQ (an exchange that is listed on Byteball homepage).

With BISQ you don't need "identifity verification". Anyone can exchange Fiat for BTC. The identity is known exclusively to the respective exchange partners. The bank does not know what exactly is traded.
Also otherwise there is no central contact point which could be queried.

On this basis, not only blackbytes but also bytes could be traded against Fiat. And then one would finally have an urgently needed interface for the direct exchange of Fiat <-> Byte/Blackbytes.

Tony knows very well. Ask him.
Unfortunately he prefers to get bogged down in gimmicks rather than real applications, which would pave the way for a mass adaptation to give appropriate space.

The question of how Blackbyte distribution will continue is still unanswered...

if thats the case it that answers the Blackbyte question from above

Blackbytes will be distributed, exactly how nobody knows, especially given the byte distribution is in many forms

I was checking wcg distribution, when I realized some funny fact: the amount of wcg points sent today to users is 400M. I was expecting like 100 GB of transfers out, but the truth is there only 40 GB. Some big crunchers are receiving a lot less than they would have to. Thanks Byteball again.

bytes can be traded for btc using the bot inside the wallet, no ID verification

This would be pseudo-privacy. Even if the bank doesn't yet know what you are exactly trading, they know who you are trading it with and all the other payment processors who handle fiat know also who are the 2 counterparts because they are forced to do AML. Since Bisq doesn't handle native currencies themselves and fiat needs to be transferred directly from one person to another, you would also need to reveal your real name to other counterpart if you do a bank transfer. This means, trading privacy coin to fiat would have even less privacy than Bitcoin has by default.

Bisq is decentralized in a sense that it's like static website that doesn't store anything about users... but it is integrated with other payment services where you still need to reveal your identity. So, yes, it is decentralized, but you can't just mashup 2 ideas like that and think that the result is still the same. But then again, since Bisq is open-source, nobody is stopping you to build something like that for Blackbytes or any other privacy coin that doesn't have a pair with fiat on Bisq. If this is what will make it mainstream then anybody who actually implements it would become a rich man/woman, but maybe there is little bit more to it than it looks.

Same to me. I used to be at Bittrex, but I don't trade there anymore since verification is required. I used to buy Bytes from Cryptopia, but for some time now the deposit and withdrawal of bytes hasn't worked anymore. The team should make every effort to ensure a good and stable exchange. It can also be decentralized if it doesn't make trading more difficult.

try cryptox.pl no KYC