Interest of the owners is to be paid from the company's profits.

All of their profits companies usually don't pay out to their owners.

There is always some retained earnings from last year and from previous years.

This exchange also very likely has retained earnings if it has some profits from previous years.

Owners of the company have their interests: to be paid out by dividends from the previous profits or the retained profits.

Clients have their interest to get what they bought  by trading at the exchange.

Clients bought many different coins and they want that coins.

Company offered to their clients some kind of  "tokens", "coins", "points" instead of coins they pose, instead of coins they paid.

If the clients want so, they (clients) can refuse exchange's offer to reimburse their coins by what they called CLM.

If the clients want so, clients can refuse their offer to reimburse their coins partially by NZD value on date determined by the exchange.

Remember, the exchange is not the court, and you can always refuse their offer if you don't agree with the exchange.

Also, for coins which are retained by the exchange (not allowing the withdrawal case), every client should have the right to get default interest defined by the laws.



Shortly, owners of the exchange want their retained earnings from the previous years, and clients want their paid coins. That two groups have opposite, conflict interests.

Clients have the bigger right and priority to their coins than owners have the right to get their retained earnings, all according to the law at the first place.

If some clients want to make agreements with the exchange to get their assets partially, then they will get partially what they paid.


Generally, the exchange owes us everything what we already paid or what we entered at the exchange for trading. We have the right for everything we pose at the exchange. Only the court can decide different. With the exchange we (every client) can make agreement the both sides, we (every client) and the exchange, agree with.


I thinks so, but the right opinion and advices everyone can get from the lawyer or attorney.

tittiecoins...reeee, did they ever build tittie-o-polis? (legit question, I haven't seen the roadmap in forever)

Big exchange DragonEx hacked:

“We’re assisting policemen to do investigation. All platform services will be closed and the accurate assets loss recovery situation will be announced in a week. For the loss caused to our users, DragonEx will take the responsibility no matter what.”


https://www.coindesk.com/singapore-based-crypto-exchange-dragonex-has-been-hacked

Takes full responsibility.
Already released TX details, within 24hrs, yet 3 months later, no TX given by christchurchNZ.


https://t.me/DragonEx_EN/50324


No official from liartopia made any statement until just a week  back.
No body at craptopia smart enough to make the basic plea for help trace, track, and freeze...

"we earnestly request help from all our fellow exchanges and other industry strength, please help us to investigate and traced the assets, freeze them and stop the assets flows".

This is a night & day comparison.
Transparency vs. Shunks

Speaking of Shady

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/uno/block.dws?1271974.htm

Totally the same, Ben.
Totally the same, Ben.  yep yep.

here's the point (which you went great to lengths to deflect and avoid mentioning)

"the stolen assets from DragonEx were transferred to the following address"

Transparency vs. Skunks

ben, wen withdrawal bro, if you want your qt azn monster girls, you should enable withdrawls  

Pst I can even throw in a harpy and a snake girl dakimakura if you get it up and running bro

ben ben ben, i can throw in a spider girl dakimakura too!

all you have to do is enable withdrawals~

(p.s im cool with the 14% haircut unlike these guys, gib monies pls)

Cryptopia isn't accepting Deposits... so why would the hacker send anything to Cryptopia and the known ETH/ERC20 addresses were posted within the Cryptopia discord immediately following the breach.
Staff weren't able to enter the building or work at that time, so how could Cryptopia immediately following the event release anything you've suggested they should have officially?

Again, you're trolling right because no one is this dense...


They haven't said they will return clients "money", they haven't said they will return ANYTHING yet specifically. So again your example fails.

That is a good point though, the ONLY thing Cryptopia didn't do that DragonEx did is say
This early they can't guarantee that, Dragonex says it will take responsibility no matter what - which is a silly thing to do because liability may be elsewhere.

Whats inside a building... systems, hardware, data... access... I know you are trolling at this point because no one is this stupid, not even on here.

Anyway, Enjoy your ignore. You aren't worth replying to anymore, can't reason with an idiot.

P.s keep replying though, nothing makes me happier than seeing the ignored people keep replying knowing you went to all the effort of writing some stupid message out and I didn't read it