<<  >> (p.194)
    Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3427041 times)

    • AizenSou
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 938
    Merit: 1000


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 09:38:47 AM
     #3861
    Quote from: fcode on February 06, 2014, 03:54:57 AM
    The new keccak code seems faster than a CPU I think.

    Q9550 @3.4 Ghz (one core)
    minerd-maxcoin --algo=keccak --benchmark
    1151 khash/s.

    i3-4130T @2.90GHz (one core)
    minerd-maxcoin --algo=keccak --benchmark
    599.59 khash/s.  (Huh?? must be a fluke, lots of stuff running on this machine)

    Celeron G1630 @ 2.80GHz (one core)
    minerd-maxcoin --algo=keccak --benchmark
    1020 khash/s

    GTX560-448
    cudaminer --algo=keccak -d 0 --benchmark -L16 -l F14x16
    28468 Kh/s

    I could not get cudaminer to run on my Quadro 295NVS. Not sure of the kernel parameters, it wouldn't start (not that I would want to run on this card anyway).

    I get 85296 khash/s with cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 16 -l K192x32 --benchmark.
    Can't even believe my eyes  Grin

    Outstanding work, Christian. Could you post your VTC address so I can donate some VTCs to you?

  • paulus51
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 616
    Merit: 321



    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 09:43:03 AM
     #3862
    hi do you have a link for the lates build ? already compiled version ?

    thanks in advanced

  • bigjme
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 350
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 09:47:53 AM
     #3863
    Quote from: AizenSou on February 06, 2014, 09:38:47 AM
    Quote from: fcode on February 06, 2014, 03:54:57 AM
    The new keccak code seems faster than a CPU I think.

    Q9550 @3.4 Ghz (one core)
    minerd-maxcoin --algo=keccak --benchmark
    1151 khash/s.

    i3-4130T @2.90GHz (one core)
    minerd-maxcoin --algo=keccak --benchmark
    599.59 khash/s.  (Huh?? must be a fluke, lots of stuff running on this machine)

    Celeron G1630 @ 2.80GHz (one core)
    minerd-maxcoin --algo=keccak --benchmark
    1020 khash/s

    GTX560-448
    cudaminer --algo=keccak -d 0 --benchmark -L16 -l F14x16
    28468 Kh/s

    I could not get cudaminer to run on my Quadro 295NVS. Not sure of the kernel parameters, it wouldn't start (not that I would want to run on this card anyway).

    I get 85296 khash/s with cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 16 -l K192x32 --benchmark.
    Can't even believe my eyes  Grin

    Outstanding work, Christian. Could you post your VTC address so I can donate some VTCs to you?



    How are you managing those speeds? When did you download the github? And windows or linux?
    Owner of: cudamining.co.uk

  • AizenSou
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 938
    Merit: 1000


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 09:52:28 AM
     #3864
    Quote from: paulus51 on February 06, 2014, 09:43:03 AM
    hi do you have a link for the lates build ? already compiled version ?

    thanks in advanced

    check github. You can compile yourself. It is new so everyone is busy with their stuffs and I don't think Windows binary will be available immediately. I can help you with compiling in Linux but for Windows I'm sorry.

    Quote from: bigjme on February 06, 2014, 09:47:53 AM
    Quote from: AizenSou on February 06, 2014, 09:38:47 AM

    I get 85296 khash/s with cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 16 -l K192x32 --benchmark.
    Can't even believe my eyes  Grin

    Outstanding work, Christian. Could you post your VTC address so I can donate some VTCs to you?



    How are you managing those speeds? When did you download the github? And windows or linux?

    I compile the newest source in my Gentoo box. Smiley

  • mrm0
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 89
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 09:52:49 AM
     #3865
    Current code cloned from github does not compile on Linux:

    Code:
    [...]
    ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z25titan_scrypt_core_kernelAILi1EL12MemoryAccess1EEvPKjii' for 'sm_35'
    ptxas info    : Used 26 registers, 336 bytes cmem[0]
    ptxas info    : Compiling entry function '_Z25titan_scrypt_core_kernelBILi1EL12MemoryAccess1EEvPjii' for 'sm_35'
    ptxas info    : Used 30 registers, 336 bytes cmem[0]
    g++  -O3 -pthread -L/usr/local/cuda/lib64  -o cudaminer cudaminer-cpu-miner.o cudaminer-util.o cudaminer-sha2.o cudaminer-scrypt.o cudaminer-scrypt-jane.o salsa_kernel.o sha256.o keccak.o fermi_kernel.o kepler_kernel.o test_kernel.o nv_kernel.o nv_kernel2.o titan_kernel.o -lcurl   compat/jansson/libjansson.a -lpthread  -lcudart -fopenmp 
    cudaminer-cpu-miner.o: In function `miner_thread':
    cpu-miner.c:(.text+0x3708): undefined reference to `scanhash_keccak'
    collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
    make[2]: *** [cudaminer] Error 1
    1BUcKJVz5n34VwuiyiLtPud1PGn3BLkcPb  :-)

  • bigjme
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 350
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 09:56:58 AM
    Last edit: February 06, 2014, 10:13:09 AM by bigjme
     #3866
    I compiled mine about 8 hours ago, there must have been some big updates?

    EDIT: i just compiled again, and still getting 34Mhash/s
    AizenSou i don't have a clue how your managing those speeds. is there anyway you can pm me your cudaminer so i can see if it runs the same for me?
    Owner of: cudamining.co.uk

  • instacalm
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 798
    Merit: 500



    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:12:04 AM
     #3867
    Quote from: bigjme on February 06, 2014, 09:56:58 AM
    I compiled mine about 8 hours ago, there must have been some big updates?

    cbuchner1 CudaMiner
    cbuchner1 authored 9 hours ago

  • AizenSou
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 938
    Merit: 1000


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:12:58 AM
     #3868
    Quote from: bigjme on February 06, 2014, 09:56:58 AM
    I compiled mine about 8 hours ago, there must have been some big updates?

    I don't see any new commits to the source because Christian is still sleeping. He worked very hard yesterday.
    I think the main different lies in the cards itself. Even if the card from the same manufacturer has the different performance. For example my two GTX780s, I bought it the same time from the same manufacturer, one gets max 270khs and another one gets 290khs for Vertcoin.

  • sippsnapp
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 322
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:13:41 AM
     #3869
    whoop, is that valid or am i missing something?

    Quote
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133856 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 134864 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 134864 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133981 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133981 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133981 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133981 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133731 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133731 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133607 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133607 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 132495 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 132495 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 135501 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 135501 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 133856 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:12:06] Total: 133856 khash/s
    :~/CudaMiner$ ./cudaminer -a keccak -l K112x40 --benchmark

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_9_Series#9800M_GTX_.5B6.5D
    Πάντα ῥεῖ
    Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm

  • bigjme
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 350
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:15:22 AM
     #3870
    yes but we're seeing 70Mhash/s, thats saying i am getting 1/3rd the performance of you which can not be right.
    Can you pm me a copy of your cudaminer to try? and perhaps post a screen shot of yours running benchmark as thats a huge achievement

    x40 is over the warp limit so its showing values way too high
    Owner of: cudamining.co.uk

  • DrFingol
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 70
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:16:10 AM
     #3871
    If anyone has successfully compiled the newest code for Windows, please post a guide to how you did it! There's some sweet VTC in it for you if you do!

    Christian, you're a godsend to us NVIDIA users! I'm going to donate!
    BTC: 1LYHvTrHZM8wgAp4zi1JdfzppujzhVt81r
    BlackCoin: B659eXAnAZx2cQbqb9MFxYcq9qZUuh1EdT

  • MarkEMarkEMark
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 12
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:22:00 AM
     #3872
    Hi all - a newbie here.

    Firstly, I've just tried the 2014-02-04 version, and I'm getting 320+kh/s on my GTX 670. It was 270 ish with 2013-12-18, and I was already impressed with that.

    I notice that you are all talking about even newer versions on Github which may be good for tonight's you-know-who-coin.

    I've gone to https://github.com/cbuchner1/CudaMiner, but now I've no idea what to do.

    I'm not a programmer, nor am I in any way Linux literate, but I do have an MSDN version of Visual Studio 2010 somewhere.

    Would anyone be willing to assist with, or point out a guide to compiling this code for Windows for noobs?

    Thanks!

  • bigjme
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 350
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:22:14 AM
     #3873
    ok so i just tried to run
    ./cudaminer --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 16 -l K300x32 --benchmark

    now thats using 2890MB memory of my 3GB, so all memory is being used, still only 34Mhash/s
    Owner of: cudamining.co.uk

  • Mav2000
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 84
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:29:56 AM
     #3874
    Same here, new to the whole mining thing and I would love to see something like this for windows...I really have no clue what you guys ae talking about.

  • bigjme
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 350
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:32:07 AM
     #3875
    This is for linux and windows. Just there arent as many of us that make it for windows
    Owner of: cudamining.co.uk

  • sippsnapp
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 322
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:33:21 AM
     #3876
    What exactly is the second number (32) standing for? K300x32

    Ive just played around a bit and figured my 9800gtx+ has 128 stream processors, K128/42 is the highest value i an run without errors.
    But still like fishing in the dark, ive not really a clue what im doing here ^^.
    Πάντα ῥεῖ
    Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm

  • bigjme
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 350
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:35:40 AM
     #3877
    Its something christian put. Just to say, x40 is over the limit for the K kernel
    Owner of: cudamining.co.uk

  • Mav2000
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 84
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:45:12 AM
     #3878
    Quote from: bigjme on February 06, 2014, 10:32:07 AM
    This is for linux and windows. Just there arent as many of us that make it for windows

    Thanks. So you just download all the files and run it or do we have to do anything else?

  • bigjme
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 350
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:47:28 AM
     #3879
    You have to compile it. Which is something not many of us set up under windows. There are those of us that do, but most dont
    Owner of: cudamining.co.uk

  • sippsnapp
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 322
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    February 06, 2014, 10:55:46 AM
     #3880
    is it possible that the second number ie 32 on K112x42 is the Theoretical Shader Processing Rate which is on the geforce 9800gtx+ 420 ie 42 the which seems the max.

    Quote
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 123688 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 123586 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 123586 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 123993 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 123993 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124198 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124198 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124096 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124096 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124506 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124506 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124609 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124609 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] GPU #0: GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+, 124816 khash/s
    [2014-02-06 11:57:09] Total: 124816 khash/s
    ~/CudaMiner$ ./cudaminer -a keccak -l K112x42 --benchmark


    112= Stream Processors
    42.0= Theoretical Shader Processing Rate (Gigaflops)

    this would explain my K112 is max and x42 is max???

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_9_Series#9800M_GTX_.5B6.5D
    Πάντα ῥεῖ
    Bitcoin + Altcoin node pool setup - pm
    Pages: « 1 ... 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 [194] 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 ... 1135 »
      Print  
Page 193
Viewing Page: 194

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com