Somehow you've managed to convince even yourself that you are some great impartial judge of the integrity of all ASIC manufacturers. But you're not.
My "shill meter" pegged when you started questioning the integrity of the Bitfury group and even it's customers by (not so) subtly suggesting that the lack of video proof meant the claims of power efficiency were bunk.
Sure, you've since walked it back but your original intention was to "throw shade" on Bitfury and make others question their integrity... presumably to get people to vote for KNC with their dollars.
Btw, I have nothing against KNC. I have equal amounts of hashing power ordered from both Bitfury and KNC. I've since added more Bitfury H boards to my order and plan on adding KNC expansion modules when/if they are offered for sale.
Then your meter is broken as nowhere did I question the integrity. You've been looking for something that did not exist and/or jumped on something without reading what I wrote. As people were comparing the two I asked for a fair comparison as I wasn't and still am not aware that video proof concerning a decisive answer with respect to power consumption at a chip level (not of USB sticks including ancillary components) exists, and that hopefully we should finally get some video from KnC very soon. Would it not be cool to have a baseline test of both? Instead of people claiming multiple power consumption ratings for BF from 0.5-1w/Gh/s. is it not annoying, and a bit odd that his products exist and no one has upped a video depicting this yet? That is precisely what I said, and Redacted was very supportive and helpful in the matter. As soon as KnC has their device to hand if they don't up a video, I shall. It just makes sense and is helpful to everyone. How you can twist that into some negative rant is beyond me, clearly you do not read and your intent on letting your imagination wander where you want.
EDiT: Anon5, just read your comment, you're right.
