<<  >> (p.57)
    Author Topic: DiabloMiner GPU Miner  (Read 867430 times)

    • Diapolo
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 773
    Merit: 500



    View Profile WWW
    January 27, 2012, 10:25:14 PM
     #1121
    My statement is true for current SDK and driver versions and that's what I meant. Sorry if I was a bit unclear Smiley.

    The whitelist is "nice to have", but it can be hard to maintain such a thing and keep it up to date ... I saw that "Loveland" for example is missing. That's the GPU part of the AMD C-50 and I'm 99% sure it works with BFI_INT patching.

    Dia
    Liked my former work for Bitcoin Core? Drop me a donation via:
    1PwnvixzVAKnAqp8LCV8iuv7ohzX2pbn5x
    bitcoin:1PwnvixzVAKnAqp8LCV8iuv7ohzX2pbn5x?label=Diapolo

  • Dyaheon
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 121
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    January 28, 2012, 02:02:06 AM
     #1122
    Diablominer doesn't work here on a freshly installed 7970. I have the newest driver that supports 7970: http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/RC11Driver.aspx

    I installed the AMD APP SDK that came with that.

    So the miner starts normally, albeit with some Java error (installed newest Java just in case), then waits for a while, and after that just shows 0 MHash with the card not doing anything. I think my install should be fine, as cgminer "worked", although it gave me like 130MH/s Tongue

    Pic:



  • sveetsnelda
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 642
    Merit: 500


    View Profile
    January 28, 2012, 02:23:46 AM
     #1123
    get rid of the "http://" at the beginning of your URL.  You aren't connected to a pool.
    14u2rp4AqFtN5jkwK944nn741FnfF714m7

  • DiabloD3 (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1162
    Merit: 1000


    DiabloMiner author


    View Profile WWW
    January 28, 2012, 08:08:24 AM
     #1124
    Quote from: Dyaheon on January 28, 2012, 02:02:06 AM
    Diablominer doesn't work here on a freshly installed 7970. I have the newest driver that supports 7970: http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/RC11Driver.aspx

    I installed the AMD APP SDK that came with that.

    So the miner starts normally, albeit with some Java error (installed newest Java just in case), then waits for a while, and after that just shows 0 MHash with the card not doing anything. I think my install should be fine, as cgminer "worked", although it gave me like 130MH/s Tongue

    Pic:





    Your command line is screwed up. Although, it shouldn't exception like that either. If you're using -o, you want -o api.bitcoin.cz
    DiabloMiner

  • DiabloD3 (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1162
    Merit: 1000


    DiabloMiner author


    View Profile WWW
    January 28, 2012, 08:15:18 AM
     #1125
    Quote from: Diapolo on January 27, 2012, 10:25:14 PM
    My statement is true for current SDK and driver versions and that's what I meant. Sorry if I was a bit unclear Smiley.

    The whitelist is "nice to have", but it can be hard to maintain such a thing and keep it up to date ... I saw that "Loveland" for example is missing. That's the GPU part of the AMD C-50 and I'm 99% sure it works with BFI_INT patching.

    Dia

    The CPU core half of that Fusion may identify itself as Loveland, but the GPU half, the Radeon 6250, identifies itself as a Wrestler.

    Edit: I don't see any of the APUs named Loveland either, there is only Desna, Ontario, Zacate, Llano. Trinity, Weatherford, and Richland aren't out yet, and will use Northern Islands-based shaders (77/78/79xx) instead of Evergreen (5xxx). There is also three that were canceled, Krishna, Wichita, and Hondo.

    Although, it seems I need to add two more names, Palm and Sumo.
    DiabloMiner

  • DiabloD3 (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1162
    Merit: 1000


    DiabloMiner author


    View Profile WWW
    January 28, 2012, 08:39:51 AM
     #1126
    Update: Added two models to bfi_int whitelist, fixed up loop code, added optimizations, fixed a few bugs
    DiabloMiner

  • Dyaheon
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 121
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    January 28, 2012, 10:41:28 AM
     #1127
    Quote from: sveetsnelda on January 28, 2012, 02:23:46 AM
    get rid of the "http://" at the beginning of your URL.  You aren't connected to a pool.

    Oh doh, thanks. Silly me for not noticing that, works fine now  Smiley

  • DiabloD3 (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1162
    Merit: 1000


    DiabloMiner author


    View Profile WWW
    January 29, 2012, 12:26:23 AM
     #1128
    Update: I think it got faster. Maybe.
    DiabloMiner

  • Roadhog2k5
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 131
    Merit: 100



    View Profile
    January 29, 2012, 01:06:42 AM
     #1129
    Quote from: DiabloD3 on January 29, 2012, 12:26:23 AM
    Update: I think it got faster. Maybe.

    Not for a 7970. :p

  • DiabloD3 (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1162
    Merit: 1000


    DiabloMiner author


    View Profile WWW
    January 29, 2012, 07:56:54 AM
     #1130
    Quote from: Roadhog2k5 on January 29, 2012, 01:06:42 AM
    Quote from: DiabloD3 on January 29, 2012, 12:26:23 AM
    Update: I think it got faster. Maybe.

    Not for a 7970. :p

    I don't think 7970s are going to GET faster. Its like, SDK 2.6 screws everybody over, and thats the way it rolls.

    WHY MUST AMD MAKE ME ANGRY, THEY WONT LIKE ME WHEN IM ANGRY, DIABLOSMASH
    DiabloMiner

  • portron
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 106
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    January 29, 2012, 03:21:38 PM
     #1131
    Quote from: DiabloD3 on January 29, 2012, 07:56:54 AM
    Quote from: Roadhog2k5 on January 29, 2012, 01:06:42 AM
    Quote from: DiabloD3 on January 29, 2012, 12:26:23 AM
    Update: I think it got faster. Maybe.

    Not for a 7970. :p

    I don't think 7970s are going to GET faster. Its like, SDK 2.6 screws everybody over, and thats the way it rolls.

    WHY MUST AMD MAKE ME ANGRY, THEY WONT LIKE ME WHEN IM ANGRY, DIABLOSMASH

    i just LOL'd in my cube

  • ragingazn628
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 714
    Merit: 500


    Coin Generator


    View Profile WWW
    January 30, 2012, 04:18:08 AM
     #1132
    what flags should I use for a dedicated miner? I just switched to Diablo Miner from CGminer

  • djinfected
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 24
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    January 30, 2012, 04:56:37 AM
    Last edit: January 30, 2012, 05:41:15 AM by djinfected
     #1133
    Upgraded to newest binary (haven't upgraded in months) and here's what I get now.

    Code:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner>cd "C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner"

    C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner>java -cp target\libs\*;target\DiabloMiner-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar -Djava.library.path=target\libs\natives\windows com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner -u username -p password -o api2.bitcoin.cz -r 8332 -w 64 -f 1000
    Picked up _JAVA_OPTIONS: -Xmx1024M -Xms1024M
    [1/29/12 11:51:33 PM] Started
    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Ljava/lang/String;)J
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Native Method)
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CLCapabilities.<clinit>(CLCapabilities.java:8)
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.create(CL.java:123)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.execute(DiabloMiner.java:180)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.main(DiabloMiner.java:94)
    It used to work just fine and now this.

    Interestingly my friend was trying to use the same new binary and he got the old com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner error. We couldn't fix it at all. But using my old binaries worked for him (but he got about 11Mhash/s versus his old 200Mhash/s on another miner).

    EDIT: another config
    Code:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner>cd "C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner"

    C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner>DiabloMiner-Windows.exe --url http://djinfected.gpu:dji12406gpu@api2.bitcoin.
    cz:8332/ -w 64 -f 1000
    Picked up _JAVA_OPTIONS: -Xmx1024M -Xms1024M
    [1/30/12 12:21:17 AM] Started
    [1/30/12 12:21:17 AM] Connecting to: http://api2.bitcoin.cz:8332/
    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Ljava/lang/String;)J
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Native Method)
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CLCapabilities.<clinit>(CLCapabilities.java:8)
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.create(CL.java:123)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.execute(DiabloMiner.java:610)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.main(DiabloMiner.java:142)
    Exception in thread "DiabloMiner GetWorkAsync for api2.bitcoin.cz" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.codehaus.jackson.Jso
    nNode.asText()Ljava/lang/String;
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner$NetworkState.doJSONRPC(DiabloMiner.java:1048)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner$NetworkState$GetWorkAsync.run(DiabloMiner.java:1118)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

    EDIT 2: fwiw I'm on a 9600 GT and I'm up to date with the latest stable driver for it.

  • DiabloD3 (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1162
    Merit: 1000


    DiabloMiner author


    View Profile WWW
    January 30, 2012, 09:44:59 AM
     #1134
    Quote from: ragingazn628 on January 30, 2012, 04:18:08 AM
    what flags should I use for a dedicated miner? I just switched to Diablo Miner from CGminer

    -f 1, usual flags otherwise.
    DiabloMiner

  • DiabloD3 (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1162
    Merit: 1000


    DiabloMiner author


    View Profile WWW
    January 30, 2012, 09:46:56 AM
     #1135
    Quote from: djinfected on January 30, 2012, 04:56:37 AM
    Upgraded to newest binary (haven't upgraded in months) and here's what I get now.

    Code:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner>cd "C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner"

    C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner>java -cp target\libs\*;target\DiabloMiner-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar -Djava.library.path=target\libs\natives\windows com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner -u username -p password -o api2.bitcoin.cz -r 8332 -w 64 -f 1000
    Picked up _JAVA_OPTIONS: -Xmx1024M -Xms1024M
    [1/29/12 11:51:33 PM] Started
    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Ljava/lang/String;)J
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Native Method)
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CLCapabilities.<clinit>(CLCapabilities.java:8)
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.create(CL.java:123)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.execute(DiabloMiner.java:180)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.main(DiabloMiner.java:94)
    It used to work just fine and now this.

    Interestingly my friend was trying to use the same new binary and he got the old com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner error. We couldn't fix it at all. But using my old binaries worked for him (but he got about 11Mhash/s versus his old 200Mhash/s on another miner).

    EDIT: another config
    Code:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner>cd "C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner"

    C:\Program Files (x86)\Bitcoin\DiabloMiner>DiabloMiner-Windows.exe --url http://djinfected.gpu:dji12406gpu@api2.bitcoin.
    cz:8332/ -w 64 -f 1000
    Picked up _JAVA_OPTIONS: -Xmx1024M -Xms1024M
    [1/30/12 12:21:17 AM] Started
    [1/30/12 12:21:17 AM] Connecting to: http://api2.bitcoin.cz:8332/
    Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Ljava/lang/String;)J
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.getFunctionAddress(Native Method)
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CLCapabilities.<clinit>(CLCapabilities.java:8)
            at org.lwjgl.opencl.CL.create(CL.java:123)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.execute(DiabloMiner.java:610)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner.main(DiabloMiner.java:142)
    Exception in thread "DiabloMiner GetWorkAsync for api2.bitcoin.cz" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.codehaus.jackson.Jso
    nNode.asText()Ljava/lang/String;
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner$NetworkState.doJSONRPC(DiabloMiner.java:1048)
            at com.diablominer.DiabloMiner.DiabloMiner$NetworkState$GetWorkAsync.run(DiabloMiner.java:1118)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

    EDIT 2: fwiw I'm on a 9600 GT and I'm up to date with the latest stable driver for it.

    Its not one of those kinds of bugs. Java on Windows is being retarded. Delete the DiabloMiner dir and unzip it again fresh.  Weird part is, not all Windows users are hitting it, and no one on any other OS is.
    DiabloMiner

  • chiropteran
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 348
    Merit: 250



    View Profile WWW
    January 30, 2012, 04:47:27 PM
     #1136
    What exactly does "hw error" indicate?  If I have 1 hw error per 100 accepted blocks, does that indicate that I might be overclocking a little too much, or is some level of hw error normal?
    http://writeangry.blogspot.com/

  • DiabloD3 (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1162
    Merit: 1000


    DiabloMiner author


    View Profile WWW
    January 30, 2012, 05:47:12 PM
     #1137
    Quote from: chiropteran on January 30, 2012, 04:47:27 PM
    What exactly does "hw error" indicate?  If I have 1 hw error per 100 accepted blocks, does that indicate that I might be overclocking a little too much, or is some level of hw error normal?

    Some level is normal, depends entirely on the card and the machine.
    DiabloMiner

  • djinfected
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 24
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    January 30, 2012, 07:06:42 PM
     #1138
    Quote from: DiabloD3 on January 30, 2012, 09:46:56 AM
    Its not one of those kinds of bugs. Java on Windows is being retarded. Delete the DiabloMiner dir and unzip it again fresh.  Weird part is, not all Windows users are hitting it, and no one on any other OS is.
    Do you suppose it's a cache updating error? Or a linking error?

    Either way, my old settings are producing less desktop interactivity now (-w 64 and -f 1000) any suggestions? Again I have an Nvidia 9600 GT. 1GB.

  • DiabloD3 (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1162
    Merit: 1000


    DiabloMiner author


    View Profile WWW
    January 30, 2012, 08:47:15 PM
     #1139
    Quote from: djinfected on January 30, 2012, 07:06:42 PM
    Quote from: DiabloD3 on January 30, 2012, 09:46:56 AM
    Its not one of those kinds of bugs. Java on Windows is being retarded. Delete the DiabloMiner dir and unzip it again fresh.  Weird part is, not all Windows users are hitting it, and no one on any other OS is.
    Do you suppose it's a cache updating error? Or a linking error?

    Either way, my old settings are producing less desktop interactivity now (-w 64 and -f 1000) any suggestions? Again I have an Nvidia 9600 GT. 1GB.

    Well, its a cache update like error of some sort.... but I'm not aware of Java only on Windows actually having such a cache.

    As for desktop interactivity, you're screwed. Nvidia hates you, yet they want your money. Such a conundrum.
    DiabloMiner

  • djinfected
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 24
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    January 30, 2012, 11:08:15 PM
     #1140
    Quote from: DiabloD3 on January 30, 2012, 08:47:15 PM
    Well, its a cache update like error of some sort.... but I'm not aware of Java only on Windows actually having such a cache.

    As for desktop interactivity, you're screwed. Nvidia hates you, yet they want your money. Such a conundrum.
    It's ok. I knew what I was buying when I bought it. Actually, I went with Nvidia because my house was too cold and I needed something warmer than a space heater or a forest fire.
    Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 »
      Print  
Page 56
Viewing Page: 57

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com