Yes as pointed out, while seven cents may not be a large amount of money to most people with access to the internet, to some people this is a much greater amount of money.
Its certainly a good point of debate. What is the appropriate rate for a transaction, should it remain scaling or a fixed rate?
These are important factors in deciding who is the target Bitcoin audience, actually.

majority of miners dont care about the fee's. they just see it as a bonus.
they would add transactions even without fee's.

it will be several decades before fee's become important.
even now with a fee war pools still ignore transactions if it means shaving a few seconds to gain slight advantage over competitive pools to get a reward.

all they care about is the blockreward.

its the dev's that are pushing the fake narative that fee's need to jump up really high soon. all because they want to bait people offchain due to such unneeded expense.

its the same reason even after segwit gets activated people should only expect to get 7tx's .. much like what was expected from 2009+ anyways. its not anything new or any big growth. its just making gestures of goodwill to sway people in their offchain direction

bitcoin transaction may have a minimum, so we can not transact in small amount. bitcoin transactions, has a minimal fee, ie 0.0002 BTC, so you possibly, will not be able to conduct transactions under 0.0002 BTC. besides, if you're doing a mediocre transaction with a small fee, it might cause a delay in the confirmation.

i don't get why people on this topic are talking about everything except the fact that the transaction in OP had a Lock Time!
it is even possible some nodes rejected his transaction until it was in a block (hence the + 0 minutes in Included In Blocks field on blockchain.info)

i think its not because the low fee or normal fee or higher fee, its because the network have a heavy load for the transaction of sending and receiving so there will be many queue in the list of blockchain. this is the main problem of blockchain network that need to be fix soon because from time to time, the transaction list will become more big than now especially if the price of bitcoin is increase. so i think we have to be patience when we want to make transaction.

Try using an alternative coin like Mintcoin. It's much better.

What`s the point of sending very low amount of btc to someone,like a few satoshis.

It`s pointless.It`s normal for the miners to focus on high fee transactions first.

Nobody said that bitcoin is a "no transaction cost" currency.

Every payment system needs transaction fees in order to work.

I think although the transaction fees have gone up, I still think it is worth using Bitcoin for general transactions. I also try to make sure I am sending a decent fee because at the end of the day, everyone needs to make money including the miners and the pools etc.

yes to less secure. but also
no to faster
faster is in the eye of the beholder. although fast to sign a multisig. the settlement due to CLTV and CSV is the same as the old banking/paypal system. funds are confirmed, but then have a maturity before they can be spend(CLTV) which means its like "unavailable balance". then there is the chargeback ability(CSV) that allows the other party to bypass CLTV and spend funds to themselves if they feel you have done payment theft.

no to cheaper
put it this way, the average real world person uses an ATM/debit/credit card 42 times a month.
LN's current concepts are to pay a hub to stay open 24/7 for 10 days, cover onchain deposit and onchain settlement aswell as the numeric representation of how many possible transactions can occur within the "channel". the upfront prepay deposit amount required to open a channel they deem as 0.006btc ($4.70) for 10 days https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2016-November/000648.html (as shown in the 'results'.

which we know 10 days is only a third of a month so 14 real world transactions average over 10 days.
which is 33cents/tx

i cant see any third world country or anyone agreeing to pay $4.70 upfront just to use a service for 10 days.

LN is not the 'scalability' cure/solution. it is simply a side service for moral spammers (faucets, gambling sites, adsense) not real people wanting to do their occasional shop for a loaf of bread.

again the devs are thinking about pricing bitcoin based on american income. not based on using code to control DDoS attempts. not using code to keep bitcoin open and border/barrierless for anyone.
its turning into a system only for the economically rich westerners

(disclosure: im a white brit with enough btc to happily retire, but i can atleast think selflessly to see the bigger picture)

Bitcoin is still suited for low amount transaction but it takes time to be confirmed on blockchain since fees are included on every transaction we made. And the higher the fee you pay, the fastest is gets confirmed. But sometimes this doesn't matter on blockchain due to large transaction traffic on the site.