Okay, fair point. I thought about how to do a better distribution, but it is very hard to find an easy to do solution. One possibility would have been a cap of a maximum of X Bitcoins per account, but then the participants would probably spread their Bitcoins over several accounts. It would have been restricted large ICO accounts with 1000+ Bitcoins to participate with the full amount. If you had set the cap at 10 Bitcoins per account, then such ICO accounts would have to distribute and register their Bitcoins to 100 addresses. An effort no one would have accepted.
Another option would be to bind distribution to an official document, such as a driving license or ID card. But this is the worst option in my opinion.
You should explain why the distribution is bad. To be honest, this is one of the best concepts for distributing coins that I have seen so far. Tony has never asked for start-up capital, nobody has ever had to invest to get free Byeballs if one own Bitcoin.
Tony has also delivered a lot so far and there is always something new. So it would be appropriate to explain your concerns.
I would advise you guys to just clone this and make a proper distribution.
Until now it looks just like one big scam. No need to say more.
I explained upthread why the distribution is bad. It gives first rounders an advandtage several magnitudes higher then everyone coming after. Why?
I though the idea was a fair distribution and that is why they choose to airdrop it for free on btc adresses.
Total fail.
I agree there with you.
One possible option would be just make equal distributions every round.
No extras for people who already have byteballs.
Airdrop it in social communities, etc not only on btc adresses.
I wouldnt be surprised if the dev holds majority of the tokens.
