That does not seem very fair now, does it?
IIRC you promoted and supported the poker chips from defcon a while back. Now that was something ugly just to make a quick buck, yet you endorsed it. Seems like your opinion on the matter fell flat after that one.
defcon's poker chips look fine in my opinion. I dont know what beef you have with defcon, but he's been fair to me.
And I purchased his poker chips simply to give people something different and unique, and the fact they were less expensive to buy in large quantities because they were poker chips. I didnt have to buy them and give people something other than signatures and holograms.
It was supposed to be a coin not offered yet anywhere at the time, but since things took too long with the Encyclopedia, defcon needed to offer those to the public after some time had passed.
If that is your professional opinion you have an opinion that should not matter.
They are basically generic poker chips purchased in bulk that hold very low quality. He then made some BTC symbol cutouts and glued them on to the chips. If this is your idea of nice coins, I don't really know.
I don't have to have beef with someone to say that their things are bad, but if that is the way it is according to you, you have beef with killyou?
Also, how were they unique? Satori chips were already out. Defcon basically made a cheap knock-off of those, I was in discussion with him during this time. He made them for a quick buck and sadly enough people paid up.
