Will do that right now. Thanks, must have missed that.

Da dice just paid out their first week of payments and they were way under budget (had budgeted ~8 btc but spent less then 2 btc). You can probably move them to active.

If you are referring to yahoo's posts from last week, then I had reviewed the last three pages of his posting history and they were mostly spam. I am not sure why he was not banned during the last week for insubstantial posts+paid signature

IMO campaign operators need to do more to actually fight spam

The post in question was not made in english so it would not have counted no matter how long it was. In the case of da dice, the campaign manager and the owner of the site are two different people so the incentive to keep costs in line are not there, all the campaign manager needs to worry about is that he does not go over budget which he accomplishes by not allowing more participants then if everyone made the max number of posts into the campaign. By not paying for spammy posts he will not attract spammers, leaving room for people who make higher quality posts, which will increase the overall effectiveness of the campaign

Temporary change in offer for CryptoVPN change in effective post count for users this month so a note might be required

EternalWingsOfGod, thank you very much for this update. Will edit the OP right now.
EDIT: Done.

---

Also, could you guys please move this stuff about the Bit-X login and verification stuff to the right thread? It's kinda off-topic in this one.

Well it seems to be your argument for the manager to pay for all posts despite their spam status, which is obviously not the solution. If you are making a lot of one liners then you are more likely to have few/none of your one liners paid for, while on the other hand if you have mostly posts that you put a lot of effort into then a very short post would be more likely to be paid out. Yes that is not treating everyone exactly the same when deciding when to pay a specific post however the one liner is more likely to be looked at closely if written by someone who has a reputation for putting effort into their posts verses someone who has likely made their ways to many people's ignore list for posting crap

Some one liners may not be considered as spammy post, but as always each signature campaign got its own manager, it will be due to the manager's opinion wether to consider some post a spammy post or not
Even a long post made by madness is considered spammy post, some signature campaign will even pay you for a short one liner spammy post, if one isnt satisfied with his current signature campaign , there is alot of choices to choose from

I have a feeling the person who posted that is Marcotheminer announcing the reduction. This is obviously speculation but it would make sense. I don't think you can edit your posts when you are banned.