I think you should put less weed and more tobacco 

Good read. For sure satoshi is not an AI, but maybe something the governments create to test out something. Too much secrets the governments hide and we don't even know if they are really doing this because for sure it is top secret. One of these days we'll just be surprised that they are releasing a perfect cryptocurrency.

That's right. And for example, according to this site: https://www.wired.com/2015/09/google-2-billion-lines-codeand-one-place/, it's clearly be said that google which developed by "human" contain about 2 Billion lines of code.
To make an AI which could build bitcoin from scratch, It must have strong logic and until now it's proven that human can't develop an AI that thinks by itself and could invent complicated thing such as bitcoin.
Therefore, assuming Satoshi Nakamoto as an A.I just doesn't make sense, I would prefer the theory that said Satoshi Nakamoto is a group of developers.

No.

Satoshi was a poor programmer, and the first code was very crappy, full of bugs and huge errors.

He may have been a good mathematician or economist to invent Bitcoin, but his coding and technical skills were very poor.

If he had been an AI, he would have already implemented an automatic blocksize increase inside the code, and not wait for others to do it.

The code would have been more automatic and self-evolving, sort of like an AI itself, a "smart code".

He was 100% human, because he made many mistakes. AI dont make mistakes.

This is  weird but a new kind of idea. Though it might be possible that a group had made an artificial intelligence that is responsible for creating bitcoins. That maybe a good idea but that would be impossible for the moment since bitcoin was created even before 2009 and Artificial Intelligence is not existing at that time and even at this time.

I don’t see any possibility of bitcoin’s invention by A.I. Today, A.I cannot even write a good meaningful poetry and writing such lines of code is not possible at least on this stage of A.I evolution. Alternatively, building such A.I is far difficult than building actual bitcoin so I don’t think there is even 1% probability of A.I contribution in inventing bitcoin.

I retract my claim. Satoshi Nakamoto is definitely a human(or trying to act like one). A genius at that. He made two mistakes in his posts: walkthough and idealogical. So what if he had invented an A.I. with which he created a bitcoin. He would have obviously made mistakes or made inelegant code just to throw us off. How about that?

With this hypothesis, we can safely say self recursively improving A.I. existed since 2008/2009. But we have not found a way to make it. Whereas Satoshi made it and used it on his own accord. But then the question again is "Who is Satoshi?".

I would say a supernatural being in the garb of a human male with human lingo. He was trying to be relevant just to throw us off.

But why did he do it? Is it a part of the grand scheme of things? We may never know...

Satoshi A.I. It was not.
Today,  There are studies poetry and film scenario writing with A.I.
I do not know any artificial intelligence programs that write their own program? But what is needed for this is to write the algorithm. Once the algorithm is written, you can convert it to any program language.

Written algorithm is already a program in its own right

The very process of formulating an algo doing something basically comes down to writing the sequence of actions (aka set of rules) required to arrive at a given result in some formal language. Converting it to a programming language is just another algo which translates this set of rules understandable by humans into the form understandable either by a computer directly (opcodes) or through another algo (compiler)


How's that?

Am I reading this correctly? If bitcoin was written by an A.I. then who wrote that A.I.? 
There has to be a human writer for something as big and as complex as this.