This is appearing to be somewhat like a reverse head and shoulder. I expect it to retrace to $120 soon.

BTC is not about fast freeish transactions. It's about preserving and being able to freely transfer value, in a 100% decentralized and trust-free scenario. It enables you to completely control your wealth. I don't know if you understand the implications of this. And "saving" value is not necessarily inferior to "burning" value consuming just because money tends to be more valuable *NOW* than *TORROW*.

And, if the above alone was not enough, Bitcoin is also a way to scream *fuck off* at the face of a bunch of nasty gusty.

This is only one of many reasons I choose Ripple as a better world currency alternative.  There are vastly more XRP's.  So many in fact, it could be literally hundreds of year, if ever, that you would need to calculate beyond the 3rd decimal.  It's nearly impossible to do this with Bitcoin because there are only 11 million of them and at most 21 million.  And that doesn't account for how many have been or will be lost forever.  I know what you'll say, "Bitcoin can be broken down to 8 decimal places."  What the vast majority of people say is, "Who cares, what a pain in the arse to deal with .00239484 of something."  And I agree.

If Bitcoin does survive, it will be as a store of value and nothing more.  But that IS a big deal in and of itself. It can not be a world currency because it can not do micro transactions.  There's no getting around that.  For Bitcoin to make that possible would undermine the security of the blockchain. (From my limited understanding) Some of these discussions, like this one, are actually filled with some sensible discourse on both sides, but in keeping with that tradition, you have to accept logic at some point.  What you want Bitcoin to be and what it realistically can be, are often 2 completely different things.

Bitcoin will never be a world currency.  Some other crypto very well may be and that could be a good thing, minus the ideological bible thumping of course.     But it's just not going to be a world currency.  No way, no how.  All that said, hoard away.  That's what it's best for.  I agree with some sentiments in, "Save" not be a slave to credit.  I couldn't agree more.  

Bottomline:  Hoarding Bitcoin does not undermine it as a world currency, because it will never be a world currency.  It is a store of value, use it as such.

  

Your gifs are funny, but your reasoning is so retarded that I'm forced to think you're trolling.

Let me ask you a very simple question: don't you realize that debt money is bad money?

You already have LOTS of it. You already have a "global currency": debt. I really don't know what you're babbling about when you start with your "Ripple superior to BTC" song.

Honestly, are you serious?

+1
How hard is it to get Bitcoins are in infinitely divisible ....

Wow... just wow dude.... if that really is a problem why don't we just multiply all bitcoins in existence with 1000 ? Nobody loses and you get that vastly more bitcoins you're looking for

But in that case, mBTC and later uBTC or satoshi will basically do the same thing, in solving this "problem".

I'm aware you don't know what I'm "babbling" about, as it relates to Ripple, because you don't understand Ripple.  You're prejudiced against anything not Bitcoin, thus remain ignorant to what Ripple really is.  Truly, Ripple is not a Bitcoin competitor or replacement.  It could become that, but that is the choice of the people.  That is not what Ripple is for.  Ripple could actually make Bitcoin more accessible to more people and businesses, without more people or more business actually having to deal directly in Bitcoin.  It's a win, win for Bitcoin.  Sure beats begging businesses to accept Bitcoin in numerous forum threads.  

How your "debt" point is even relevant, I'm still trying to figure that out.

So moving the decimals a few zero's to the left is "building a better wheel"?

bye 110