They are talking about energy consumption and HARDWARE REQUIREMENT reductions.
They are putting those are positive aspects of this step, while they are obviously negative aspects.

I couldn't stand it more than three minutes.

They merged.




https://www.theblock.co/post/169846/the-merge-live-coverage-of-ethereums-major-upgrade

You have to know (you possibly do already) that many people classify such statements as "true", but in reality, it's just an expression of opinion.
The opinion tells people nothing about the motif. Trudeau is not dumb (yeah, that's also just an opinion, i admit), so chances are high that there is certain motif behind a statement like this. To be honest, she only shows one side of the sheet, something completely opposite (like "printing money is insane, though") may be written on the other side, which he doesn't mention, so he leaves room for interpretation. This is a part of some kinf of message control, which is to be regarded as indirect manipulation.
Most people are soo easy to manipulate. You can safely consider 80% of people being sheeple, which are favoured recipients for such statements, because peeps like Trudeau can predict their reaction. This is just a simpe layout, because he would not be adressing one type of recpient (the "ordinary" voter), but sending signals to various lobbies and interest groups. You can safely suggest that almost everything he says was predefined by a team of communication experts, by who he is also being coached how to speak to "the public" to send a "secret" message along, which influences the receiving crowd in a way they would think the resulting opinion is coming from themselves.
Well, it is not. This is what sheeple usually do, and "leaders" like Trudeau are well educated on how to exploit it.

Politicians are like sales people. Treating them like such would help a bit to make the world "better", i guess.


Don't jinx it  


You mean Vitalik is the assaulting one, while the living crash test dummy is the staker?  

Whoops.. I accidentally merited that.. and now I am struggling to figure out how such post might not convolute the ideas of shitcoins with my lil precious..  





It sounds worse than guessing to me.  He's describing a scenario that likely has less than 50% odds of happening.. I am not very sure of what a fair assignment of odds would be, but the way that execijutiere is framing the matter is given way too much weight to his projected scenario and suggesting that the odds are pretty high.  

What do you think execijutiere?  

over or under 70% odds for your outlined scenario?  Do you want to bet your odds?

Go ahead.. give us some conviction regarding how high of odds you would like to give to your scenario, and let's try to figure out if your scenario is "bettable?"


Oh?  You know how to speak, Cryptolove20015?

¡¡¡¡Qué Sorpresa!!!!  

These are your own words Cryptolove20015.. or did you take them from somewhere else?

Also where is your evidence to show that "China is back among the top 10"?  Do you have any links to sources?


Ooooooo

You do have a link to the underlying...   And you know how to speak too..

GREAT.  great..

This is very good news, someone should be responsible for the LUNA case and I see that Do Kwon and his team doesn't really care about that, even though he and his team should have been jailed for causing massive losses to many investors. good job for official south korea

so obvious what a lying POS that guy is...

...but people still follow him like sheep  ...just like Faketoshi^TM


would love to see them both as opponents in a cage fight