That is it El duderino_!
Lot of people needs credits to their predictions although they could be right or maybe are following the past sequence on how the price moves but when it wasn't the way they expected you wouldn't see them voice to their wrong prediction, but when it goes accordingly you would see series of them want an accolade in their overall predictions. Though have some respected users whom I do follow their predictions and never joke with them, I have took my time following up some of them over here and OG is always good at his shoots about price.

always shoot the messenger

My mining went from burning 200+kwatts per hour to under 10kwatts per hour

I am selling gpus and buying coins with the sales.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/156282022404


I got a lot of cheap coin today. some at 56.9k

I have a lot of cash to buy if we continue to drop.

I do not want holder tax.

And much like og I sold some at over 70k on 3 different times this year.  which is one reason I have cash to buy at 56.9k

Not mining much changes my game plans a lot.

Bitcoin Magazine & staff are pretty savagely mocked on Twitter. Absolute disgrace to Bitcoin.

That would only be applicable if that story was about a boy who saw a wolf coming, warned people repeatedly for a crazy amount of time and they ignored him. Then when the wolf ate all the sheep the retarded people in the village started blaming him for speaking the wolf into existence because they said no wolves would ever come.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

man that must waste a lot of ammo

 
 Imagine a ridiculously unlikely scenario which affects no one and then try affect change to bitcoin to fix that non-existent "problem".  ffs  Why is bitcoin magazine giving print-space to anons?
 
 If I wanted a demurrage coin, I would have been all-in on Freicoin.  It's not much different than any fiat currency which already has a similar intrinsic property and I can store that under my mattress until it's worthless if I so chose.  If one cannot make a profit by mining Bitcoin based on the existing rewards and fees, one should not be mining bitcoin.  If it were decided that Bitcoin needed another fee to promote mining, who decides how high the HODL fee is?  Who decides how many miners are allowed to operate?  Who gets final say on the diff limits?  Why should I be shut out of mining just because my gov't charges me an energy tax and your gov't doesn't?  I want to get in on the mining as well.  From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!  Raise the fees!

 Hodlers lower the liquidity and increase the scarcity of Bitcoin every.single.day. making it a more desirable an asset.  I don't image anon is a hodler - hodling isn't easy by any stretch of the imagination... don't do any work pfft!

 Why do socialist want to destroy everything?  Get the fuck out of here.

 I'm not opposed to hearing other's views but I don't like the fact that there is no section for comments; no place for rebuttals as we're goaded with "Who’s ready to write a BIP?"

 One of the stated values of Bitcoin Media LLC is:

"Be Prudent
Bitcoin is scarce, and so are company resources. Treat our resources like you would your own. Be prudent and sensible when it comes to spending so that we can control our own destiny (Please do not sell company chairs) - Stack Sats Mentality"

 Also within its stated policy:

"The editorial staff accepts stories and story pitches entirely on their journalistic merits, timeliness, capacity for coverage and specific relevance to the publication’s readership in the Bitcoin space."
 
  Imo, that article is a fail on both counts if they paid for that content.