The balance comes when regulators understand the difference between individual users holding their own keys and custodial accounts that hold your money for you ie coinbase.  Custodial accounts will need some form of regulation, Bitcoin itself does not need, and cannot be, regulated.

What everyone seems to fail to understand is that the way you think of "balance" in these matters has changed forever


Put simply: regular users are interested in Bitcoin because it protects their interests, that is, their money. And it protects their money without government regulators, it does the job all by itself. It even protects ordinary users from regulators, as crucially, they have no effective way of regulating either the network or individual users.


And businesses are realising the same thing. Where the regulators lose their leverage to regulate, businesses will gain increased protection. Strange, isn't that supposed to be the regulator's role, protecting the interests of businesses and regular folk? Like most "protection" regimes, it's a more than a little ambiguous exactly who is being protected and from what.

Well there is a reason why business owners are still not putting their money on bitcoin and that is because it is still unstable, they don’t want to risk putting money and then losing it is not good for their business, we as bitcoin users we don’t care about the price dropping by a $10 that does not affect us but on the big scale it affects a lot that is why it is risky.

If you do business somewhere, anywhere, everywhere, then you have to chose if you want to play by the rules of the location you do your business, if you want to argue and fight the rules or if you want to ignore them. In most places you have to play by the government rules and accept the regulations or you run an illegal business. You do have the option to fight (with your army of lawyers) and might change somethings.
If you run an illegal business, then your priority should be to not get caught and your customers should be aware of the risks. If you run an legal business, then just follow the rules and your customers should know where they stand and what rules apply.
Those two cases seem trivial and the remaining one is the interesting one, which will also be the one that most Bitcoin business are in. The rules are not done yet and change and the situation might change quickly and often. A company running under these circumstances will have one priority: make profit.
In order to do so most will want to stay in business and this means to pay attention to two things and balance them if you want to say so. Follow the regulations to a point where you can not be banned or fined into bankruptcy. On the other hand you want to please your customers (in this case protect their privacy) so that they stay your customers.
If you go full privacy, then you might get banned and are out of business. If you go full regulation, then you might loose all your customers and go out of business. Finding the middle ground is the key to success, but if you are forced to chose between those two extremes, then most will chose to stay with the regulations, since it is easier to find new customers then getting the regulators off your back.
A company will always make the promises the customers will want to hear, but i would not count on them. 

sorry, but i disagree. If i had a shop in 2010 and made all my business deal in cash (we assume i run a fiat exchange at a tourist hot spot), how could they force me to comply or shut me down? Because this will be the answer how they will do it with Bitcoin.
There are rules you can play by or not. Using Bitcoin it might be easier to not play by the rules, but this will not change the rules.
If you think that i still do not get your point, then maybe make an example and help me understand.

You still don't get it, despite the provision of an example. Cash can be easily confiscated, Bitcoin cannot.

To be forced to register your wallet and personal information can only be done on web wallets. Govt. Cannot control the desktop wallets and one can have as many wallets as he wants without the govt. knowing it. So if the bitcoin is to be regulated then the only option is to stop the desktop and hardware wallets and make only web wallets functional which is impossible.

And this is why they want control?
It will look like a balance but still it is for their own pockets. Well, it is quite understandable if we think of it. If there is no tax the government cannot work. Who want to be an official without pay. But with this, what they really want is more. The taxes are not enough so they see a hole in bitcoin to where they could earn more. This is BS but it is our own government who we are talking about.

Things haven't changed and won't change. Bitcoin isn't anonymous, it is pseudonymous. That means govts can enforce their laws if they want to.

If you don't like the laws in a given jurisdiction, you need to move. Staying put and imagining that a bit of technology will get round legal structures is wishful thinking.

Regulators want to take tax out of profit bitcoin traders are making with trading and also they want to stop people from sending their yuan out of country which is one of the cause for devaluation of their currency. Also they want to limit money laundering, any legally operating exchangers have to comply with this so they have to present all their record book to government.

So this types of regulated/registered trading platform can't protect customers information and they have to do this to keep running. But governments can't stop bitcoin transaction, face to face deal and deal over localbitcoins is best way to get way without noticed/investigated by authority.